JonNotJon
@jonnotjon.bsky.social
FREE PALESTNE. White, Jewish, Bi, cis, AuDHD, geek (not a nerd; nerds are smart). ACAB, land back. may be nsfw.
Reposted by JonNotJon
Reposted by JonNotJon
November 10, 2025 at 2:45 AM
Reposted by JonNotJon
plenty of noblesse, very little oblige
These are the Democrats who voted with their Republican friends to double healthcare costs for millions of Americans. They're all millionaires.
November 10, 2025 at 5:34 AM
plenty of noblesse, very little oblige
Reposted by JonNotJon
Two things need to happen simultaneously:
1) A rapid mobilization and expansion of mutual aid networks to protect, feed, and care for each other
2) A tireless effort to elect progressive politicians looking to oust these fascists and their spineless enablers
1) A rapid mobilization and expansion of mutual aid networks to protect, feed, and care for each other
2) A tireless effort to elect progressive politicians looking to oust these fascists and their spineless enablers
November 10, 2025 at 5:23 AM
Two things need to happen simultaneously:
1) A rapid mobilization and expansion of mutual aid networks to protect, feed, and care for each other
2) A tireless effort to elect progressive politicians looking to oust these fascists and their spineless enablers
1) A rapid mobilization and expansion of mutual aid networks to protect, feed, and care for each other
2) A tireless effort to elect progressive politicians looking to oust these fascists and their spineless enablers
Reposted by JonNotJon
Knowing the BBC this is deliberate.
They'll soon be refusing to use even 'transwoman', like their pals at the Telegraph and Times.
Earlier this week, the Times described a trans woman as a "sexually active male who identifies as a woman called Rose"
They'll soon be refusing to use even 'transwoman', like their pals at the Telegraph and Times.
Earlier this week, the Times described a trans woman as a "sexually active male who identifies as a woman called Rose"
Did you notice the BBC put transwoman instead of trans woman on the website
December 5, 2024 at 12:09 PM
Knowing the BBC this is deliberate.
They'll soon be refusing to use even 'transwoman', like their pals at the Telegraph and Times.
Earlier this week, the Times described a trans woman as a "sexually active male who identifies as a woman called Rose"
They'll soon be refusing to use even 'transwoman', like their pals at the Telegraph and Times.
Earlier this week, the Times described a trans woman as a "sexually active male who identifies as a woman called Rose"
Reposted by JonNotJon
can't wait to see this inspiring messaging incorporated into the DSCC fundraising appeals
November 10, 2025 at 1:44 PM
can't wait to see this inspiring messaging incorporated into the DSCC fundraising appeals
Reposted by JonNotJon
where is this idea coming from that zohran mamdani believes that israel is the greatest evil in the world? what has he ever said or done to give the impression? it's completely delusional. it's a worldview ascribed to him with no basis in reality.
![To quote Rabbi Donniel Hartman in his podcast (with Yossi Klein Halevi), “For Heaven’s Sake“:
I believe that the level of vilification of Israel, by the mayoral candidate Mamdani, is a moral corruption …
Hate [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu from now to kingdom come! Some of my best friends hate Netanyahu. You want to distance yourself from Israel until the government changes? Call Israel genocidal in its war in Gaza? All of the above. But the level of obsession with Israel as the great evil of the world is morally corrupt. And so that’s why Jews are so upset.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:zju7gpf2woz5vwegmzdg2acl/bafkreidmanmxdulgamurzv4n6oobvhjxzdmmxj3qlhi2mw5cspgthplwya@jpeg)
November 10, 2025 at 1:45 PM
where is this idea coming from that zohran mamdani believes that israel is the greatest evil in the world? what has he ever said or done to give the impression? it's completely delusional. it's a worldview ascribed to him with no basis in reality.
Reposted by JonNotJon
I will not be watching or reading any "analyses" about the Democratic party in D.C. I know all about them & their complicity. I'm not interested and I choose to reclaim my time and attention.
There're other kinds of politics to engage & most importantly to do (including in our local communities).
There're other kinds of politics to engage & most importantly to do (including in our local communities).
November 10, 2025 at 1:59 PM
I will not be watching or reading any "analyses" about the Democratic party in D.C. I know all about them & their complicity. I'm not interested and I choose to reclaim my time and attention.
There're other kinds of politics to engage & most importantly to do (including in our local communities).
There're other kinds of politics to engage & most importantly to do (including in our local communities).
Reposted by JonNotJon
“But will you condemn Hamas anyway and swear a blood oath for the right of the state of Israel to exist????”
November 10, 2025 at 3:06 PM
“But will you condemn Hamas anyway and swear a blood oath for the right of the state of Israel to exist????”
Reposted by JonNotJon
As if Hamas has so much cash they are funding people overseas.🤦🏽
November 10, 2025 at 2:39 PM
As if Hamas has so much cash they are funding people overseas.🤦🏽
Reposted by JonNotJon
We’re just asking questions!
November 10, 2025 at 4:24 PM
We’re just asking questions!
Reposted by JonNotJon
I heard that the New York Times funds Islamic Jihad. They really should get ahead of these concerning stories.
November 10, 2025 at 2:48 PM
I heard that the New York Times funds Islamic Jihad. They really should get ahead of these concerning stories.
Reposted by JonNotJon
This leads us to the obvious question: Is The NY Times operated by a covert ring of child sexual predators? WHY WON’T THEY ANSWER?!
November 10, 2025 at 2:33 PM
This leads us to the obvious question: Is The NY Times operated by a covert ring of child sexual predators? WHY WON’T THEY ANSWER?!
Reposted by JonNotJon
"The supermarket tabloids already have it. Sadly, we have no choice but to follow their lead. We are powerless before this."
November 10, 2025 at 2:29 PM
"The supermarket tabloids already have it. Sadly, we have no choice but to follow their lead. We are powerless before this."
Reposted by JonNotJon
“it’s already in the new york post” knocked the wind out of me
November 10, 2025 at 2:26 PM
“it’s already in the new york post” knocked the wind out of me
Reposted by JonNotJon
more information in her caption
November 10, 2025 at 2:23 PM
more information in her caption
Reposted by JonNotJon
“a group has suggested, without evidence, that you are accepting money to further hamas’s agenda. would you like to legitimize this by addressing it in the paper of record?”
November 10, 2025 at 2:21 PM
“a group has suggested, without evidence, that you are accepting money to further hamas’s agenda. would you like to legitimize this by addressing it in the paper of record?”
Reposted by JonNotJon
Ms Rachel says The New York Times asked her if she’s funded by Hamas
November 10, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Ms Rachel says The New York Times asked her if she’s funded by Hamas
Reposted by JonNotJon
These times deserve better from the Times.
November 10, 2025 at 2:50 PM
These times deserve better from the Times.
Reposted by JonNotJon
Reposted by JonNotJon
“The MSNBC liberals are saying things irl that will get you banned on Bluesky“ is one of the few silver linings of this current crop of failures.
November 10, 2025 at 3:51 PM
“The MSNBC liberals are saying things irl that will get you banned on Bluesky“ is one of the few silver linings of this current crop of failures.
Reposted by JonNotJon
one thing about that shit that explains a lot about dems to me is they don't do those 'in house'. they're contracted out to other agencies who have every reason to constantly hit you up so they can boost their numbers and get a bigger slice.
dems don't have the energy to do their own begging.
dems don't have the energy to do their own begging.
November 10, 2025 at 3:59 PM
one thing about that shit that explains a lot about dems to me is they don't do those 'in house'. they're contracted out to other agencies who have every reason to constantly hit you up so they can boost their numbers and get a bigger slice.
dems don't have the energy to do their own begging.
dems don't have the energy to do their own begging.
Reposted by JonNotJon
whenever you get cascaded nonstop with donation begging while the actual people they're taking money for have the energy of a dead fish, this is the key thing to keep in mind. those emails are being sent out not by the party but by a separate group trying to get their own pay too.
November 10, 2025 at 4:06 PM
whenever you get cascaded nonstop with donation begging while the actual people they're taking money for have the energy of a dead fish, this is the key thing to keep in mind. those emails are being sent out not by the party but by a separate group trying to get their own pay too.
Reposted by JonNotJon
they'll take cash, sure, but they'll do it on phone calls with donors and 10k plate dinner events. actually contacting you, the voters? doing it *all the time*? that's work. that's a lot more work than they wanna do. and it involves interacting with the proles. they ain't doing that.
November 10, 2025 at 4:00 PM
they'll take cash, sure, but they'll do it on phone calls with donors and 10k plate dinner events. actually contacting you, the voters? doing it *all the time*? that's work. that's a lot more work than they wanna do. and it involves interacting with the proles. they ain't doing that.
Reposted by JonNotJon
it's something i try to keep in mind despite frustrations; i used to be a liberal. watched a lot of daily show, read a lot of magazines and newspapers, considered myself oh so smart. eventually, the contradictions were just too much for me to stay there.
happened earlier for me. later for others.
happened earlier for me. later for others.
November 10, 2025 at 3:57 PM
it's something i try to keep in mind despite frustrations; i used to be a liberal. watched a lot of daily show, read a lot of magazines and newspapers, considered myself oh so smart. eventually, the contradictions were just too much for me to stay there.
happened earlier for me. later for others.
happened earlier for me. later for others.