johnwkrakauer
@johnwkrakauer.bsky.social
Of course. It’s extraordinarily that we even need to have this discussion - again - I despair.
September 6, 2025 at 5:27 PM
Of course. It’s extraordinarily that we even need to have this discussion - again - I despair.
Agree, it is not a useful term at the level of neuroscience. It is an undeniable capacity at the psychological level. What the neuroscience of this capacity will look like is anyone’s guess.
June 19, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Agree, it is not a useful term at the level of neuroscience. It is an undeniable capacity at the psychological level. What the neuroscience of this capacity will look like is anyone’s guess.
Reposted by johnwkrakauer
...it basically confirmed what is already well-established: LLMs (& LRMs & "LLM agents") have trouble w/ problems that require many steps of reasoning/planning.
See, e.g., lots of recent papers by Subbarao Kambhampati's group at ASU. (2/2)
See, e.g., lots of recent papers by Subbarao Kambhampati's group at ASU. (2/2)
June 9, 2025 at 10:53 PM
...it basically confirmed what is already well-established: LLMs (& LRMs & "LLM agents") have trouble w/ problems that require many steps of reasoning/planning.
See, e.g., lots of recent papers by Subbarao Kambhampati's group at ASU. (2/2)
See, e.g., lots of recent papers by Subbarao Kambhampati's group at ASU. (2/2)