John Farnsworth
@john.rfc805.net
Can we agree as long as they go first?
December 6, 2025 at 10:37 PM
Can we agree as long as they go first?
If, like me, you have a car that Michelin doesn't deign to make the cross climate for. There is a Vredestein knockoff (I'm sure they'd claim it isn't) called the Quatrac that is probably a little worse but overall pretty much the same.
November 29, 2025 at 9:48 PM
If, like me, you have a car that Michelin doesn't deign to make the cross climate for. There is a Vredestein knockoff (I'm sure they'd claim it isn't) called the Quatrac that is probably a little worse but overall pretty much the same.
Is this where it started? The bar discipline standards being too loose, and the processes too slow?
Or would it even matter, and the bad actors would wear their disbarment as a badge of honor?
Or would it even matter, and the bad actors would wear their disbarment as a badge of honor?
November 29, 2025 at 7:14 PM
Is this where it started? The bar discipline standards being too loose, and the processes too slow?
Or would it even matter, and the bad actors would wear their disbarment as a badge of honor?
Or would it even matter, and the bad actors would wear their disbarment as a badge of honor?
Seems clearly the answer is the former. In fairness, less their fault, more that the judges turned first.
November 29, 2025 at 6:53 PM
Seems clearly the answer is the former. In fairness, less their fault, more that the judges turned first.
Well, there is a bit of truth here. "This is actually insane".
November 29, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Well, there is a bit of truth here. "This is actually insane".
Well, you see, we're using AI. Congress and the President have suggested that it's illegal to regulate AI. So, check and mate.
Also, our argument was generated by AI, so you can't argue against it either.
Also, our argument was generated by AI, so you can't argue against it either.
November 27, 2025 at 3:29 AM
Well, you see, we're using AI. Congress and the President have suggested that it's illegal to regulate AI. So, check and mate.
Also, our argument was generated by AI, so you can't argue against it either.
Also, our argument was generated by AI, so you can't argue against it either.
How dare you incite democracy?
November 27, 2025 at 1:56 AM
How dare you incite democracy?
That, oddly, is the 3rd time I've seen that brought up in the last week. I wonder how many degrees of separation from the same CME conference we all are.
November 24, 2025 at 2:52 AM
That, oddly, is the 3rd time I've seen that brought up in the last week. I wonder how many degrees of separation from the same CME conference we all are.
Going to have to change all her merch from WI to WW
November 23, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Going to have to change all her merch from WI to WW
Cocaine is a hell of a drug. -Rick James
November 13, 2025 at 1:25 AM
Cocaine is a hell of a drug. -Rick James
The longer plan is economic damage to these cities. The cruelty is the method. But they also know it will weaken them long term with massive economic impact over the next decade. Weakened economy means weakened political influence.
November 9, 2025 at 2:45 PM
The longer plan is economic damage to these cities. The cruelty is the method. But they also know it will weaken them long term with massive economic impact over the next decade. Weakened economy means weakened political influence.
Who knew that the gray goo that would do us in would actually just be in the form of words/text.
November 8, 2025 at 2:51 PM
Who knew that the gray goo that would do us in would actually just be in the form of words/text.
Now, the question is, will they screw this up and use it to sell/remove commuter parking instead. Because then we'll manage to make traffic worse.
November 2, 2025 at 4:36 PM
Now, the question is, will they screw this up and use it to sell/remove commuter parking instead. Because then we'll manage to make traffic worse.
@legaleagle.tv covered this in a recent video. As with so many other things, the answer is: the Supreme Court.
November 2, 2025 at 2:27 AM
@legaleagle.tv covered this in a recent video. As with so many other things, the answer is: the Supreme Court.
Was it because the judge is pissed?
I thought it was because he told her he hadn't reviewed the incidents in question yet. So she basically said "ok, come back after reviewing them, then we'll ask again"
It feels like the appeals court made this ruling ignoring that he was unprepared.
I thought it was because he told her he hadn't reviewed the incidents in question yet. So she basically said "ok, come back after reviewing them, then we'll ask again"
It feels like the appeals court made this ruling ignoring that he was unprepared.
October 31, 2025 at 9:06 PM
Was it because the judge is pissed?
I thought it was because he told her he hadn't reviewed the incidents in question yet. So she basically said "ok, come back after reviewing them, then we'll ask again"
It feels like the appeals court made this ruling ignoring that he was unprepared.
I thought it was because he told her he hadn't reviewed the incidents in question yet. So she basically said "ok, come back after reviewing them, then we'll ask again"
It feels like the appeals court made this ruling ignoring that he was unprepared.
The interesting part of all of it to me: Trump's administration told us exactly what they would do, by complaining previous administrations did it to them. It's a weird prophetic hypocrisy.
October 29, 2025 at 5:30 PM
The interesting part of all of it to me: Trump's administration told us exactly what they would do, by complaining previous administrations did it to them. It's a weird prophetic hypocrisy.
I do believe they're all on the prosecution side these days.
October 28, 2025 at 10:42 PM
I do believe they're all on the prosecution side these days.
Just tell people you practice "radical candor' and everyone will just say you're a business genius.
October 27, 2025 at 11:23 PM
Just tell people you practice "radical candor' and everyone will just say you're a business genius.
Trump is Nero, Roberts is the fiddle.
October 21, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Trump is Nero, Roberts is the fiddle.
Maybe that would finally cross a line for Mike Johnson.
October 19, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Maybe that would finally cross a line for Mike Johnson.
Columbia University, The District of Columbia, Colombia. He's got a theme for sure.
Anyone up for making a bingo card of all things named similarly?
Anyone up for making a bingo card of all things named similarly?
October 19, 2025 at 2:10 PM
Columbia University, The District of Columbia, Colombia. He's got a theme for sure.
Anyone up for making a bingo card of all things named similarly?
Anyone up for making a bingo card of all things named similarly?
If the states aren't doing anything illegal, they will only face a brief period of federal martial law. They'll be free to go on their way once the dissenters have been moved to appropriate camps.
October 18, 2025 at 12:27 AM
If the states aren't doing anything illegal, they will only face a brief period of federal martial law. They'll be free to go on their way once the dissenters have been moved to appropriate camps.
Reposted by John Farnsworth
/2 The Roberts Court 6-3 majority is best understood not as a genuine or legitimate independent adjudicatory body but as a ceremonial adjunct to the Trump government, like a First Lady or a second-born prince in a constitutional monarchy.
October 17, 2025 at 9:38 PM
/2 The Roberts Court 6-3 majority is best understood not as a genuine or legitimate independent adjudicatory body but as a ceremonial adjunct to the Trump government, like a First Lady or a second-born prince in a constitutional monarchy.