Jakub Limanowski
banner
jlimanowski.bsky.social
Jakub Limanowski
@jlimanowski.bsky.social
Professor of biological psychology
@unigreifswald.bsky.social. Member @jungeakademie.bsky.social.

https://psychologie.uni-greifswald.de/43051/biologische-psychologie/prof-dr-jakub-limanowski/
Thanks, Pedro!
October 16, 2025 at 8:47 AM
Congratulations!
October 2, 2025 at 10:02 AM
(check out the paper for more results!)
September 22, 2025 at 1:25 PM
There was, however, one region that *did* show different responses to delays depending on their behavioural relevance: the cerebellum. A nice support for its key role in adaptation as suggested by many others!
September 22, 2025 at 1:25 PM
But, lo and behold, the usual suspects (i.e. temporoparietal and premotor cortices) responded strongly to delays—independently of behavioural relevance. Maybe visuomotor comparison is a basic process of self-other distinction that is not affected (much) by task demands!
September 22, 2025 at 1:25 PM
We replicated key activations of posterior parietal, extrastriate, and cerebellar areas by visuomotor adaptation. The nice thing is: We show these activations compared with exposition to identical visual delays and movements, but in the absence of attempted adaptation.
September 22, 2025 at 1:25 PM
So, we used an fMRI-VR visuomotor adaptation task with frequent changes in visual feedback delays. BUT half of the time, participants had to ignore the visual feedback (no adaptation).
September 22, 2025 at 1:25 PM
Awesome, congratulations!
September 8, 2025 at 6:27 PM
Yes, absolutely, good point! Several studies come to my mind here, e.g. academic.oup.com/scan/article...
August 22, 2025 at 6:50 PM
Feedback and literature suggestions most welcome, thank you (for your attention to this matter!)
June 25, 2025 at 1:33 PM
AND: violations of visual kinematic invariants in spatially displaced feedback can be detected during observation (as in previous work e.g. by @royesal.bsky.social); but that even here, action enhances sensitivity through visuomotor comparisons.
June 25, 2025 at 1:33 PM
We show that perception overall benefits from action (i.e., visuomotor comparisons); especially for delayed feedback.
June 25, 2025 at 1:33 PM
So the key difference was in whether or not visual and motor kinematics corresponded; and using the elliptical shape, we expected participants to produce systematic variations in velocity - and be sensitive when visual feedback violated those.
June 25, 2025 at 1:33 PM
There's some neat bits to our design (we believe), such as that delayed and displaced feedback followed the same (elliptical) trajectory as the executed movement; and that it was matched in terms of overall spatial deviation.
June 25, 2025 at 1:33 PM