No idea. Looking at the source, it should've been easy to figure out that these are intentional

It took me a moment to understand what is the issue :D

There are a few other results in the paper. Such as how to consider imperfect oracles etc.

Our original intention was to show that Uber assumption reduces to n-PDL (just like in the algebraic group model, but now in the standard model.) However, this we show to be impossible with any generic reduction (such as den Boer-Maurer reduction).

"By the national bibliometry rules, conference papers are not counted in the most important reporting processes. Thus, we are strongly incentivised with money to publish research in venues where the impact is lower."

That was surprising to read. I hope it will change.

Thank you 🙂