Not dissimilar metathesis seems to be reflected in the borrowing of West Semitic *rumḥ (‘spear’) as *murḥ (hence Coptic ⲙⲉⲣ(ⲉ)ϩ).
Not dissimilar metathesis seems to be reflected in the borrowing of West Semitic *rumḥ (‘spear’) as *murḥ (hence Coptic ⲙⲉⲣ(ⲉ)ϩ).
Find more: ociana.osu.edu/inscriptions...
Find more: ociana.osu.edu/inscriptions...
Not dissimilar metathesis seems to be reflected in the borrowing of West Semitic *rumḥ (‘spear’) as *murḥ (hence Coptic ⲙⲉⲣ(ⲉ)ϩ).
Not dissimilar metathesis seems to be reflected in the borrowing of West Semitic *rumḥ (‘spear’) as *murḥ (hence Coptic ⲙⲉⲣ(ⲉ)ϩ).
Something like, שׁממה [occurs] three times (ג̇), twice defectively (ב̇ חָסֵר) and once fully (וחד מָלֵא). [Ordered by appearance], [the first is] ותשב תמר ושממה, [the second, which is plene]כי־רבים בני־שוממה מבני, [and the third] נתנני שממה.
Something like, שׁממה [occurs] three times (ג̇), twice defectively (ב̇ חָסֵר) and once fully (וחד מָלֵא). [Ordered by appearance], [the first is] ותשב תמר ושממה, [the second, which is plene]כי־רבים בני־שוממה מבני, [and the third] נתנני שממה.
but is it better explained in light of the tendency for pre-tonic *u to prompt gemination (עָמוֹק/עֲמֻקִּים), since כֻּתֹּ֫נֶת isn’t geminated in (unstressed) construct forms (e.g., כְּתֹנֶת הַפַּסִּים)?
but is it better explained in light of the tendency for pre-tonic *u to prompt gemination (עָמוֹק/עֲמֻקִּים), since כֻּתֹּ֫נֶת isn’t geminated in (unstressed) construct forms (e.g., כְּתֹנֶת הַפַּסִּים)?
Entitle the paper ‘The Imputation of Śin’.
Entitle the paper ‘The Imputation of Śin’.
Entitle the paper ‘The Imputation of Śin’.
Entitle the paper ‘The Imputation of Śin’.
The effect of the Canaanite Shift on a stress-lengthened *a? Or the Phoenician Shift? (When does the latter date?)
The effect of the Canaanite Shift on a stress-lengthened *a? Or the Phoenician Shift? (When does the latter date?)
The effect of the Canaanite Shift on a stress-lengthened *a? Or the Phoenician Shift? (When does the latter date?)
The effect of the Canaanite Shift on a stress-lengthened *a? Or the Phoenician Shift? (When does the latter date?)
"Today, Friday, let us put our siblings who are in Sudan, and all the land of Sudan - especially Al Fashir, in Darfur - in our prayers: may God hold their hand in the situation they are in..."
"Today, Friday, let us put our siblings who are in Sudan, and all the land of Sudan - especially Al Fashir, in Darfur - in our prayers: may God hold their hand in the situation they are in..."
I was intrigued to discover that Swahili appends -Vw to verbal stems to make them statives, just like Ancient Egyptian.
Anyone know of non-Bantu languages that do the same thing?
I was intrigued to discover that Swahili appends -Vw to verbal stems to make them statives, just like Ancient Egyptian.
Anyone know of non-Bantu languages that do the same thing?
Relevant comparative data gratefully received.
As I understand it, dual-esque suffixes in names like Ephraim (אֶפְרַיִם) and are thought to go back to */aym/ and are (often) viewed as secondary developments.
Relevant comparative data gratefully received.
As I understand it, dual-esque suffixes in names like Ephraim (אֶפְרַיִם) and are thought to go back to */aym/ and are (often) viewed as secondary developments.
Relevant comparative data gratefully received.
As I understand it, dual-esque suffixes in names like Ephraim (אֶפְרַיִם) and are thought to go back to */aym/ and are (often) viewed as secondary developments.
Relevant comparative data gratefully received.
As I understand it, dual-esque suffixes in names like Ephraim (אֶפְרַיִם) and are thought to go back to */aym/ and are (often) viewed as secondary developments.
Several Egyptian hieroglyphic signs are birds. Here are some common bird signs and their meanings/uses:
[resurrecting an old but topical thread]
Several Egyptian hieroglyphic signs are birds. Here are some common bird signs and their meanings/uses:
[resurrecting an old but topical thread]
⟨smn⟩ = ‘goose’ is a good Egyptian lexeme, attested from the Old Kingdom onwards.
It presumably reflects *sV̆mānV̆(w) since it appears in Coptic as ⟨smune⟩.
⟨smn⟩ = ‘goose’ is a good Egyptian lexeme, attested from the Old Kingdom onwards.
It presumably reflects *sV̆mānV̆(w) since it appears in Coptic as ⟨smune⟩.
⟨smn⟩ = ‘goose’ is a good Egyptian lexeme, attested from the Old Kingdom onwards.
It presumably reflects *sV̆mānV̆(w) since it appears in Coptic as ⟨smune⟩.
⟨smn⟩ = ‘goose’ is a good Egyptian lexeme, attested from the Old Kingdom onwards.
It presumably reflects *sV̆mānV̆(w) since it appears in Coptic as ⟨smune⟩.
ociana.osu.edu/inscriptions...
ociana.osu.edu/inscriptions...
ociana.osu.edu/inscriptions...
ociana.osu.edu/inscriptions...
אֵ֫שֶׁל
n.m. tamarisk-tree
אֵ֫שֶׁל
n.m. tamarisk-tree
Can anyone confirm/deny? Or provide examples from other languages?
Can anyone confirm/deny? Or provide examples from other languages?