jahoffman
@jahoffman.bsky.social
Fiscal conservative, social 'stay the f#ck out of my bedroom,’ father of two young adults worried about their future where ideologies rule over common sense.
So much easier when the bots clearly self-identify. Block and move on…
April 15, 2025 at 1:46 AM
So much easier when the bots clearly self-identify. Block and move on…
I nominate the Gumbies…
March 25, 2025 at 12:12 AM
I nominate the Gumbies…
Minty Python’s Gumbies would do a better job.
March 25, 2025 at 12:06 AM
Minty Python’s Gumbies would do a better job.
Well, if anyone knows about failing magazines, it’s DJT…
March 24, 2025 at 11:55 PM
Well, if anyone knows about failing magazines, it’s DJT…
That $36T did not come from overspending on legislatively authorized programs, it is the result of not taxing the wealthy their fair share. Even if we ended all discretionary spending today - ALL OF IT - the GOP proposal would still add trillion$ to the debt.
March 14, 2025 at 7:44 PM
That $36T did not come from overspending on legislatively authorized programs, it is the result of not taxing the wealthy their fair share. Even if we ended all discretionary spending today - ALL OF IT - the GOP proposal would still add trillion$ to the debt.
Well, sort of…
The agency may be undone by EO, but the executive branch is still obligated to disperse the funds and advance the mission detailed in the underlying legislation.
The agency may be undone by EO, but the executive branch is still obligated to disperse the funds and advance the mission detailed in the underlying legislation.
February 8, 2025 at 4:22 AM
Well, sort of…
The agency may be undone by EO, but the executive branch is still obligated to disperse the funds and advance the mission detailed in the underlying legislation.
The agency may be undone by EO, but the executive branch is still obligated to disperse the funds and advance the mission detailed in the underlying legislation.
Glass houses, Senator.
Glass. Effing. Houses.
Glass. Effing. Houses.
January 14, 2025 at 3:40 AM
Glass houses, Senator.
Glass. Effing. Houses.
Glass. Effing. Houses.
“He’s a businessman…”
Evidence would indicate otherwise:
Evidence would indicate otherwise:
January 2, 2025 at 6:16 PM
“He’s a businessman…”
Evidence would indicate otherwise:
Evidence would indicate otherwise:
A study in self-loathing…
December 27, 2024 at 8:13 PM
A study in self-loathing…
I think I grew up calling it a “dough knife,” but everyone has it listed as a blender:
December 24, 2024 at 1:24 AM
I think I grew up calling it a “dough knife,” but everyone has it listed as a blender:
Sigh.
It looks like I’ve managed to irritate even the normally unflappable Dutch…
… I really need to work on my diplomatic skills.
It looks like I’ve managed to irritate even the normally unflappable Dutch…
… I really need to work on my diplomatic skills.
December 13, 2024 at 11:31 AM
Sigh.
It looks like I’ve managed to irritate even the normally unflappable Dutch…
… I really need to work on my diplomatic skills.
It looks like I’ve managed to irritate even the normally unflappable Dutch…
… I really need to work on my diplomatic skills.
We can play these games all night, but nonsense propaganda does not advance your argument. Simply put, Harris did not lose for failing to make an empty campaign promise intended to woo voters sympathetic to the crisis in Gaza.
December 13, 2024 at 10:39 AM
We can play these games all night, but nonsense propaganda does not advance your argument. Simply put, Harris did not lose for failing to make an empty campaign promise intended to woo voters sympathetic to the crisis in Gaza.
But, why?
Hamilton warned us that a populist only has to be smarter than his followers. Sadly, he was so wrong in his ultimate conclusion.
Hamilton warned us that a populist only has to be smarter than his followers. Sadly, he was so wrong in his ultimate conclusion.
December 9, 2024 at 5:04 PM
But, why?
Hamilton warned us that a populist only has to be smarter than his followers. Sadly, he was so wrong in his ultimate conclusion.
Hamilton warned us that a populist only has to be smarter than his followers. Sadly, he was so wrong in his ultimate conclusion.
She’s only a symbol, and by redefining what she represents of the American Experience, he has effectively already done so…
December 9, 2024 at 4:39 PM
She’s only a symbol, and by redefining what she represents of the American Experience, he has effectively already done so…
This is everything I’ve been saying for eight years.
December 4, 2024 at 7:18 PM
This is everything I’ve been saying for eight years.
December 4, 2024 at 4:57 PM
And still you continue to talk past the fact that the purpose of the EC was to implement the Compromise for presidential elections and not some late 20th century fallacy of, “coalition-building.” Your persistence in presenting ancillary historical facts does not change this.
December 4, 2024 at 7:34 AM
And still you continue to talk past the fact that the purpose of the EC was to implement the Compromise for presidential elections and not some late 20th century fallacy of, “coalition-building.” Your persistence in presenting ancillary historical facts does not change this.
Sorry, who’s not teaching what?
November 25, 2024 at 2:12 PM
Sorry, who’s not teaching what?
@yosef-s.bsky.social: “… I'm stating a fact.”
Sadly, no.
You’re mistakenly conflating sex with gender. Here’s the result of a simple ChatGPT query. While neither comprehensive nor conclusive, the science says gender identity and its role in society isn’t the binary assignment you believe it to be.
Sadly, no.
You’re mistakenly conflating sex with gender. Here’s the result of a simple ChatGPT query. While neither comprehensive nor conclusive, the science says gender identity and its role in society isn’t the binary assignment you believe it to be.
November 24, 2024 at 2:43 PM
@yosef-s.bsky.social: “… I'm stating a fact.”
Sadly, no.
You’re mistakenly conflating sex with gender. Here’s the result of a simple ChatGPT query. While neither comprehensive nor conclusive, the science says gender identity and its role in society isn’t the binary assignment you believe it to be.
Sadly, no.
You’re mistakenly conflating sex with gender. Here’s the result of a simple ChatGPT query. While neither comprehensive nor conclusive, the science says gender identity and its role in society isn’t the binary assignment you believe it to be.