J3zz
LightNews LightNews
banner
j3zz-g.bsky.social
J3zz
@j3zz-g.bsky.social
1.2K followers 270 following 3.8K posts
"Not only do we naturalize history, but also consequently we naturalize the social phenomena which express our oppression, making change impossible." -Monique Wittig
Posts Replies Media Videos
Pinned
j3zz-g.bsky.social
J3zz @j3zz-g.bsky.social · 6d
How gender critical was Nazi Germany? Let’s find out & compare some top gender critical “beliefs” with evidence from historical Nazi Germany. Each post has a GC position + a picture from a historical source or modern research paper. English translation & the source are in each picture’s alt-text.
Reposted by J3zz
kd-smith.bsky.social
Indeed. It goes way back.

More than 10 years ago, before they even called themselves "gender critical," or set up their lobby groups, Mumsnet transphobes were taking inspiration from "Bathroom bills" in the US, which were part of the far-right's aim of painting trans women as a predatory threat.
Where Did Anti-Trans Laws Start? How a Forgotten Houston Ordinance Turned Into a Massive, Nationwide Culture War
In fighting for bathroom bills in Houston, Texas conservatives provided a blueprint for the rest of the country.
thebarbedwire.com
December 9, 2025 at 1:19 PM
Reposted by J3zz
jjvincent.bsky.social
can't stop watching this clip of a tesla Optimus teleoperator taking his headset off before properly logging out the robot
December 8, 2025 at 9:29 AM
Reposted by J3zz
madmaudlin.bsky.social
December 9, 2025 at 6:08 AM
Reposted by J3zz
ket.bsky.social
cis people have never met a trashcan of ideology they won't immediately shove their heads into
When the claimant first met the second respondent in August 2023 the claimant believed that the second respondent was a male from hair worn in a ponytail which appeared to the claimant to be receding, that the second respondent was she thought taller than the average woman, the second respondent being materially taller than the claimant, that the second respondent had she thought a prominent Adam’s apple, and had she thought large hands and feet.
December 8, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Reposted by J3zz
claudialuisa16.bsky.social
#TERF Rona Duwe zeigt das Ausmaß ihrer krankhaften pervertierten Hetze indem sie Menschen, die sich für ungeteilte Menschenrechte einsetzen auf X (vormals Twitter) als #Glaubenskrieger bezeichnet.
https://x.com/ronalyze/status/1998076430073450865 Kopie aus X Post https://x.com/ronalyze/status/1651854274157051905 Kopie aus X Post
December 9, 2025 at 9:41 AM
Reposted by J3zz
sloanelysbeth.bsky.social
if you wanna know how untrustworthy our press is just look at the way they're claiming that transphobic nurse won her case when she lost on all counts but won a minor technicality on one issue.

it's not even spin. it's just straight up lying about what actually happened.
December 9, 2025 at 9:43 AM
Reposted by J3zz
mitildide.bsky.social
They didn't just "say" it, they published a fucking paper about it
CorrespondenceOnline firstNovember 20, 2025 Portion sizes and caloric inequity: a hidden driver of obesity disparities Naveed Sattar naveed.sattar@glasgow.ac.uk ∙ Zara S Sattar ∙ Lindsey J Sattar ∙ Jason M R Gill When only one portion size is offered, women, children and individuals of shorter stature are therefore routinely served more calories than needed, contributing to gradual but progressively greater average adiposity gain than in men. This effect is amplified in lower socioeconomic status groups, where access to affordable, appropriately sized meals is more scarce We propose that food outlets offer at least two portion sizes for common single portion ready-to-eat products, differing by around 25%—the average difference in energy requirements between men and women—and priced fairly. This would also help provide more appropriate portion sizes for all smaller individuals (eg, children and those who are of short stature). We believe this would help: consumers to choose portions better aligned with their energy needs; mitigate obesity disparities; and cut food waste. It could also support environmental sustainability by lowering demand for resource-intensive products such as meat. Companies adopting this approach could gain competitive advantages by appealing to health-conscious consumers, demonstrating corporate social responsibility, and differentiating themselves in a marketplace where ethical and sustainable practices are increasingly valued. A more inclusive approach to portion sizing could be a simple yet meaningful step in addressing the growing inequities in obesity globally and improving public health outcomes.
December 9, 2025 at 9:13 AM
Reposted by J3zz
goodlawproject.org
An important point to come out of the Sandie Peggie case is that 'gender critical' employees can't take matters into their own hands and confront trans employees. If they do that it is likely to be harassment/ bullying/ a hate incident.
So far as her other comments are concerned, they were impermissible manifestations of her belief and were in our view what amounted to an incident of harassment by the claimant of the second respondent related to the protected characteristic of gender reassignment, reasonably perceived by the second respondent to be so, and were a breach by the claimant of section 26 of the Act and of the Bullying and Harassment Policy. The second respondent was entitled to view the actions of the claimant in those particular regards as being such harassment, or as a “hate incident” within the policy, and the first respondent was entitled in principle to act on the complaint made, but the detail of how it did so depends on all the circumstances as more fully addressed below. The second respondent was also entitled to regard the claimant’s actions as a breach of the second respondent’s Article 8 rights, so far as the claimant’s expression of her beliefs was impermissible. 1034. We also considered that the claimant had acted deliberately to be able to challenge the second respondent whilst they were alone. What she did was to wait until other members of staff had left the changing room, and for the second respondent to leave the cubicle, before raising her own beliefs directly with the second respondent in the manner we have set out. 1035. Whilst the claimant had not been informed as promptly and in the detail we considered appropriate, and the first respondent did not consider whether to revoke permission at all, the claimant did not herself raise any formal grievance under the policy. She is an experienced member of staff who had access to union advice. She knew, or ought reasonably to have known, that the first respondent having granted permission to the second respondent she required to have raised her concerns with the first respondent as the decision-maker rather than with the colleague to whom it had been granted, and in any event ought not to have done so in the manner that she did.
December 9, 2025 at 9:20 AM
Reposted by J3zz
matthimon.bsky.social
Erste Prozessberichte zu #AntifaOst, Dresden:
"Dann erzählt Thomas von Jugendlichen, die 1992 tot in Königs Wusterhausen gefunden wurden. Dann nennt er, um von Neonazis ermordeten 'alternativen Jugendlichen Namen und Gesicht zu geben... 👇
www.basc.news/antifa-ost-k...
December 8, 2025 at 9:06 PM
Reposted by J3zz
franklynnewt.bsky.social
Honestly people trying to "reclaim" Harry Potter by getting their fanfic publish or queering it or whatever as if that's going to somehow spite JKR are annoying. All you're doing is keeping those books culturally relevant because you can't let go of something you read when you were 8. Grow up.
December 9, 2025 at 9:22 AM
Reposted by J3zz
anarchygoose.bsky.social
The same people pretending to want to isolate children from the internet for their own good argue that it is correct to beat their children when they misbehave.

They know what they are doing. The state just wants to further enshrine the parent-child relationship as one of ownership.
December 9, 2025 at 8:59 AM
Reposted by J3zz
badambulist.bsky.social
HR departments countrywide need to start treating gendercrit employees as potentially hostile. As soon as you are required to interact with one, you dust off the rulebook, you dot every eye and cross every t, and you assume bad faith at every turn.

They are a threat to every organisation.
December 8, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Reposted by J3zz
sarahviktoria.bsky.social
This social media ban is a religious social conservative agenda. Trans children (who the BBC are forbidden to mention in their style guidelines) can find mutual support online when they are isolated in their local community. Forbidding that is what they mean by "let children be children" #r4today
December 9, 2025 at 7:17 AM
Reposted by J3zz
davidbtn2.bsky.social
Susan Hall, the gift that keeps giving.

Yes, nothing says sanity better than attempting to sex a genital-free mass of flour, butter and sugar 😂
adambienkov.bsky.social Adam Bienkov @adambienkov.bsky.social · 18h
Nothing says getting into the festive spirit like going online to shout at some biscuits
December 8, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Reposted by J3zz
sheg7.bsky.social
I'd pay good money just to see her argument for these biscuits being "biologically male"
Susan Hall on twitter: look at this nonsense, NO, they are gingerbread men Picture, Packet of 16 Morrisons Gingerbread People
December 8, 2025 at 6:15 PM
Reposted by J3zz
helenm40.bsky.social
December 8, 2025 at 6:46 PM
Reposted by J3zz
sarahviktoria.bsky.social
And the BBC calls Dr Beth Upton a "biological male."

This is like continuous deadnaming under the guise of informing and uses an expression tat could equally be applied to a single celled protozoan.
goodlawproject.org Jolyon Maugham KC @goodlawproject.org · 22h
I can't help but remember that "it" is also the word used by the man who murdered poor Brianna Ghey in a transphobic attack.

These people don't have "reasonable concerns" - they are revolting bigots.
632. A wider aspect of evidence we considered concerned an attack on her position in cross examination to the effect that she was generally transphobic, which she denied both when giving evidence initially and on recall (which is addressed further below). Some of the messages she sent are indicative of views which could be described as trans-phobic. In one dated 10 January 2024 the claimant described the second respondent as “it”. In an earlier part of the same message there is reference to the second respondent having a shadow (being in our view a reference to the appearance of stubble on the face) and a “pathetic voice”. These are disparaging remarks in relation to the second respondent in our view, because of the second respondent being a trans woman. 633. In another the second respondent is described as a “weirdo”, which the claimant sought to explain as someone acting weirdly, but which we did not accept as being what she had intended by use of that word. These remarks we consider to be consistent with other evidence of her making comments the second respondent was liable to find offensive that went beyond the simple expression of a gender critical belief, but amounted to personal attacks on the second respondent.
December 8, 2025 at 6:42 PM
Reposted by J3zz
elierlick.bsky.social
A happy ending for all.
December 8, 2025 at 6:43 PM
Reposted by J3zz
rvbdrm.com
Why is Benjamin Ryan being so weird?

Does sharing Bluesky skeets on twitter help him gain substack subscriptions, or is he trying to direct online harassment to these users below?
Screenshot of a tweet on X by Benjamin Ryan. His twitter post reads: “The person in the screenshot maintains a tradition of attacking me viciously (the person recently said they’d like to assault me with a baseball bat; and yet Bluesky never sanctioned them) and personally without ever actually pointing to anything errant I’ve ever written or said. I’m glad to be in the company of Singal and @HelenLewis, meanwhile.” Below is a screenshot of a Bluesky post from FreeLinkophant Shelley B… Handle: @shelleybwoke.bsky.social. The Bluesky post text reads: “The most frustrating thing about the faces of the transphobic corporate media (Singal, Stalker Ben Ryan, Helen Lewis, etc. …) is that they’re so fucking lame and self-absorbed and incredibly self-assured in their wrongness. It’s really not about you, you sick fucks. Below that is a reply from the same user: “And even just on a technical level, the writing SUCKS ASS.” Screenshot of a tweet on X by Benjamin Ryan. His tweet reads: “Astrophysicist Katie Mack explains what compels her to write errant Bluesky posts. Dr. Mack recently claimed that ‘Gender affirming care saves lives’ based on a study that did not reach that conclusion and could not have supported such a causal claim.” Below is a screenshot of a Bluesky post from Katie Mack, with a cartoon avatar drawing. Handle: @astrokatie.com. Her post reads (verbatim): “Every once in a while someone accuses me of posting something they don’t agree with ‘for the likes’ and I assure you it is not for the likes or for any reason other than that I am constitutionally incapable of not posting” Below is a reply from Katie Mack: “Is it a bad post? Very well then it is a bad post. (I am large, I contain multitudes of them.)” Below is a second embedded tweet from Benjamin Ryan with a small thumbnail of another Bluesky screenshot. Handle: @benryanwriter. Timestamp: His text read: “Astrophysicist Katie Mack reposted on Bluesky a Substack article by Erin Reed about a new study with the proclamation that ‘Gender-affirming care saves lives.’” Screenshot of a tweet on X by Benjamin Ryan. His text reads: “A good way to promote literacy is to have kids read books.” Below is a screenshot of a Bluesky post by Pixie Thinks Handle: @pixiethinkss.bsky.social. The post reads: “People don’t understand what is meant by ‘literacy’ and the ‘literacy crisis’. Literacy isn’t just not being able to physically read. Many people know how to see words and say words, which is basic reading. Literacy is being able to infer the correct information from what you read.” Screenshot of a tweet on X by Benjamin Ryan. His text reads: “Ad hominem attacks, name calling, vague accusations, etc.” Below is a screenshot of another tweet by Benjamin Ryan. His text reads: “And if UK comedian Adrian Comerford were paying attention, he would see that the majority of those books are, in fact, what he would characterize as the ‘pro-trans’ types. But never let the facts get in the way of a viral Bluesky post.” Below is a reposted Bluesky post by Aidan Comerford. Handle: @aidancomerford.b…. The post reads: “‘Look at how I have been educating myself on trans people,’ says Ben Ryan, and then posts a picture of books that are mostly anti-trans propaganda, and, hilariously, a stack of papers with a ruler beside them as if we measure quality of information by the centimetre. These people are ridiculous.” Below is another embedded screenshot of a tweet by Benjamin Ryan with a photo of a stack of books. His text (partially visible) reads: “This person in the quote tweet said that I post about pediatric gender medicine without educating myself.
December 8, 2025 at 6:11 PM
Reposted by J3zz
helenm40.bsky.social
Your colleague Labour MP Joani Reid just described trans people as a 'virus'.

Because she was upset that a vexatious case brought by a racist, transphobic nurse didn't go her way.

Tell me again about Labour's 'progressive policies'.
December 8, 2025 at 5:48 PM
Reposted by J3zz
goodlawproject.org
I can't help but remember that "it" is also the word used by the man who murdered poor Brianna Ghey in a transphobic attack.

These people don't have "reasonable concerns" - they are revolting bigots.
632. A wider aspect of evidence we considered concerned an attack on her position in cross examination to the effect that she was generally transphobic, which she denied both when giving evidence initially and on recall (which is addressed further below). Some of the messages she sent are indicative of views which could be described as trans-phobic. In one dated 10 January 2024 the claimant described the second respondent as “it”. In an earlier part of the same message there is reference to the second respondent having a shadow (being in our view a reference to the appearance of stubble on the face) and a “pathetic voice”. These are disparaging remarks in relation to the second respondent in our view, because of the second respondent being a trans woman. 633. In another the second respondent is described as a “weirdo”, which the claimant sought to explain as someone acting weirdly, but which we did not accept as being what she had intended by use of that word. These remarks we consider to be consistent with other evidence of her making comments the second respondent was liable to find offensive that went beyond the simple expression of a gender critical belief, but amounted to personal attacks on the second respondent.
December 8, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Reposted by J3zz
goodlawproject.org
Oooft. Sandie Peggie shared highly offensive messages and was then "untruthful" in giving evidence to the Tribunal.

This is the 'hero' Gender Critical campaigners have chosen.
631. The third aspect was her evidence given when recalled in relation to a message she had passed on to her group of friends which related to floods in Pakistan in the most highly offensive terms. She initially described the messages as “dark humour”. Her evidence later was that the message had been sent to provoke a reaction, in broad summary. We did not consider that latter evidence to be credible given the content of the message sent and her initial evidence about it. In our view it was an untruthful attempt to downplay what she had done, which she recognised as having included very offensive material. We consider that it was clear beyond serious argument that the author or authors of the original message considered the remarks humorous, and that the claimant had also considered them humorous which was why she had passed them on. That was supported in our view by her reference to dark humour
December 8, 2025 at 2:34 PM
Reposted by J3zz
sloanelysbeth.bsky.social
labour are describing us as a virus now.

im sure that doesn't have any historic implications.

watch how starmer ignores it and it goes completely unmentioned and undisciplined.
helenm40.bsky.social Helen @helenm40.bsky.social · 19h
Your colleague Labour MP Joani Reid just described trans people as a 'virus'.

Because she was upset that a vexatious case brought by a racist, transphobic nurse didn't go her way.

Tell me again about Labour's 'progressive policies'.
December 8, 2025 at 6:33 PM
Reposted by J3zz
reactiveashley.bsky.social
The BBC News at Six is highly misleading. They present the story as if the bigot has won the case, which is false. To make matters worse, they end with their editor reading a proclamation “of the Supreme Court” that is entirely incorrect.
December 8, 2025 at 6:18 PM
Reposted by J3zz
jojofe24.bsky.social
👇
smreine.itch.io Chilly SM Reine ❄️ @smreine.itch.io · 19h
someone pointed out to me that rich people are better at class solidarity than anyone else, and will always place class solidarity first

since then, i have never been surprised by this kind of behavior
rajandelman.bsky.social Blue sky nice ghost @rajandelman.bsky.social · 20h
All these people are in their own stupid little world, huh
December 8, 2025 at 6:21 PM