Loathley Medusa who now?
November 9, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Loathley Medusa who now?
Her jacket is from the Kenneth Parcell Collection.
November 4, 2025 at 1:59 PM
Her jacket is from the Kenneth Parcell Collection.
Stancil has been the target of some strange and incessant online harassment campaigns, including a recent series of racially noxious, AI-generated cartoons. I don't know how he does it, but there's a lot to learn from his fearless approach.
November 2, 2025 at 4:12 PM
Stancil has been the target of some strange and incessant online harassment campaigns, including a recent series of racially noxious, AI-generated cartoons. I don't know how he does it, but there's a lot to learn from his fearless approach.
Whitmer (voice muffled by folder): I don't know what you're talking about.
October 24, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Whitmer (voice muffled by folder): I don't know what you're talking about.
Holy shit.
October 23, 2025 at 1:47 AM
Holy shit.
Oh. So it's blasphemy, too.
October 20, 2025 at 3:19 PM
Oh. So it's blasphemy, too.
And we've had this tech since 1972!
October 20, 2025 at 1:44 PM
And we've had this tech since 1972!
NYTimes homepage at 10:21 pm, Saturday, 18 October 2025.
October 19, 2025 at 2:52 PM
NYTimes homepage at 10:21 pm, Saturday, 18 October 2025.
Ngl, I was skeptical of your recent arguments concerning the relative *quantities* of people involved in the CRM vs. No Kings. I respect Angus Johnston's position a *lot*. But you're right: the raw numbers matter. The NYT certainly knows it. We ought to know it, too.
October 19, 2025 at 2:32 AM
Ngl, I was skeptical of your recent arguments concerning the relative *quantities* of people involved in the CRM vs. No Kings. I respect Angus Johnston's position a *lot*. But you're right: the raw numbers matter. The NYT certainly knows it. We ought to know it, too.
Bari is NOT a puppet! She's a statue a clown college.
October 12, 2025 at 9:41 PM
Bari is NOT a puppet! She's a statue a clown college.
This NYT Magazine profile of a notorious dictator from 1939 reads exactly like it would today, complete with fawning, breezy prose and generous visuals.
September 22, 2025 at 1:39 PM
This NYT Magazine profile of a notorious dictator from 1939 reads exactly like it would today, complete with fawning, breezy prose and generous visuals.
This guy really doesn't have much of a moral or intellectual compass, does he?
September 3, 2025 at 8:15 PM
This guy really doesn't have much of a moral or intellectual compass, does he?
Apropos of nothing, here are some of James Carville's houses.
August 22, 2025 at 2:52 PM
Apropos of nothing, here are some of James Carville's houses.
Snoopy's first appearance, just over three years later:
July 31, 2025 at 7:56 PM
Snoopy's first appearance, just over three years later:
"Did someone call me?"
July 29, 2025 at 1:23 PM
"Did someone call me?"
This moment of worthless performative cringe?
![[A Bluesky post.]
Hakeem Jeffries
@hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social
For. The. People.
[A black and white picture of Hakeem Jeffries and Cory Booker sitting on some steps. The style is meant to evoke the 1986 Run-DMC album "Raising Hell." In the corner is the familiar album sticker reading "PARENTAL ADVISORY EXPLICIT CONTENT."]
2.3K reposts
533 quotes
15.4K likes](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:qtxlb5qhfuxkendfdzqm3h3f/bafkreib42x4bnv7bdyjvwo4wgfr6useah5inmdyw36uaeebwcm2il5eb6a@jpeg)
July 20, 2025 at 9:21 PM
This moment of worthless performative cringe?
What this says about an ostensibly professional Dem messaging guy's media literacy is one thing. And the ethics of a (minor) attempted coverup is another (minor) thing. But the 1999 quote that Rosenberg doesn't want us to read is also hilariously clumsy and revealing in it's own right:
![Rosenberg said in 1999, "Our
problem as a party is that the biggest source of our venture capital now comes from labor, which is a group that's becoming less and less important, and representing less and less of a percentage of American voters. ... We have to replace labor's investment in the party with investment from another source, [end]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:qtxlb5qhfuxkendfdzqm3h3f/bafkreibkogunuu4njfhsoppzjbm7ar5zbdytevye2zuflzetc7ikud3npm@jpeg)
July 16, 2025 at 1:50 AM
What this says about an ostensibly professional Dem messaging guy's media literacy is one thing. And the ethics of a (minor) attempted coverup is another (minor) thing. But the 1999 quote that Rosenberg doesn't want us to read is also hilariously clumsy and revealing in it's own right:
Of course, editing your own Wikipedia entry is a violation of Wikipedia's editorial standards, so he got called out for it and overridden by other editors. He then got huffy and condescending about not being allowed to dictate his own biography. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_ta...
![Content you added was copied from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. Diannaa (talk) 21:47, 30
January 2025 (UTC) [reply]
[Highlighted paragraph, from SimonWDC:]
Friend, we need to have a conversation about what you took down from my page. It is literally just my official bio, and everything I put down were things I had done, from my own life. There is no conflict of interest. I am literally stunned that it is possible for someone to override my own description of my own life as this my page. SimonWDC (talk) 19:01, 13 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
You have a wp:Conflict of interest; you should not be editing Simon Rosenberg. Please use a p:Edit request; see wp:Simple conflict of interest edit request.
The page Simon Rosenberg is about you, but it is not yours, it's Wikimedia's. Just like this Atlantic article i is Atlantic's. Adakiko (talk) 19:34, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
[ reply ]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:qtxlb5qhfuxkendfdzqm3h3f/bafkreibmsbacl7xuoarhbffu6fkbhqlgr2qduteywccezxu7afljm45hke@jpeg)
July 16, 2025 at 1:50 AM
Of course, editing your own Wikipedia entry is a violation of Wikipedia's editorial standards, so he got called out for it and overridden by other editors. He then got huffy and condescending about not being allowed to dictate his own biography. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_ta...
Here are pictures of the authors of this article (Samantha Delouya, left, and Elisabeth Buchwald, right). I used the same fair and evenhanded editorial sensibility as CNN in selecting these images.
July 14, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Here are pictures of the authors of this article (Samantha Delouya, left, and Elisabeth Buchwald, right). I used the same fair and evenhanded editorial sensibility as CNN in selecting these images.
Now, you know he ain't been quite right since the accident.
July 12, 2025 at 3:03 PM
Now, you know he ain't been quite right since the accident.
Little known fact—and this is true—Trump was quietly added to the backside of Rushmore a long time ago. They exaggerated his height, of course, but that’s nothing new.
June 29, 2025 at 1:32 PM
Little known fact—and this is true—Trump was quietly added to the backside of Rushmore a long time ago. They exaggerated his height, of course, but that’s nothing new.
The real story here is that the Green House is openly threatening President Thomas Jefferson!
June 7, 2025 at 1:54 PM
The real story here is that the Green House is openly threatening President Thomas Jefferson!