That's wonderful! Congratulations!

If your idea floats in water, then it's a bad idea (and/or a witch)

One of your better ones 🙂

This is a great book: www.cambridge.org/core/books/c...

Oh no, they scheduled their annual fundraising bake-off for right before the NeurIPS Deadline!

Luckily I handwrite all my LaTeX, and then just give it to the secretarial pool for data entry into the mainframe.

NeurIPS is the winter conference of our discontent

2/2
Now, some other possible headlines that would fit same space, match just as well with the data in the piece, and convey an entirely different impression. And—my opinion— say more about what the realities actually are.

Entire rest of world envies this US model.

(Byline for these heds? JMF)

Those are actually land jellyfish. Very dangerous!

JL: n ~ log m
Curse of dimensionality: m ~ exp(n)

Optimistic and pessimistic perspectives on the same fact of life.

Alan was director of LIDS when I was a postdoc there. I never had any formal student/advisory relationship with him, but he was always super generous with his time and insights, and happy to sit down and talk through ideas. Such a great mentor!

Hey, what's wrong with WordArt?

Of course, the process is imperfect in many ways. But it still provides a useful and egalitarian service when done in good faith by all parties (authors, reviewers, editors/ACs).

If you're famous (or good at hype) your arxiv post will get the attention and scrutiny it deserves.

Peer review makes this offer: whoever you are, submit to us & we'll find ~3 experts to read carefully, check for issues/novelty, and offer feedback. If it passes, it gets our stamp of approval.

No, but you are homotopically connected to that person.