Akhil Puri
banner
howshallwelive.bsky.social
Akhil Puri
@howshallwelive.bsky.social
I am an ex-climate tech entrepreneur. I write about the Metacrisis and how we can solve it. Check akhilpuri.substack.com
Our future is not yet written. Let's write it ourselves. #AI #UBI #Metacrisis #Robotics
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
31/ We will either learn to swim together, or we will sink together. There is no other way.

The time for passive hope is over. Support democratic renewal. Advocate for transnational coalitions. Redirect your skills to work on human and planetary flourishing.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
30/ A world that supports a good life for all of humanity and the rest of life is possible, but it won't be handed to us. It must be built by us.

We must wake up and see the self-destructing trajectory we are on. We must ask what makes life worth living and realize that we are all in this together.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
29/ And you might disagree with this solution altogether, but the solution is not the point. We can think of other ones. The key point is that the dangerous lie of UBI will persist and take us to our doom until democracy is strengthened and these incentives are realigned.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
28/ This solution is, of course, at a very high level and would need to be sketched out in far more detail. But it isn’t impossible. The EU is already planning a 30 billion dollar investment in AI to catch up to the China and the US
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
27c/ Force the real debate: The energy footprint of AI is set to be massive—OpenAI wants to consume electricity equal to the whole of India. Can we afford this while in an ecological crisis?
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
27b/ Force cooperation: Control enough of the AI supply chain to force the US and China to the table to implement trustless, transparent cooperation mechanisms.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
27/ This coalition could:

a. Drain power from incumbent players: A top AI/robotics engineer today is complicit in their own doom by working for players with misaligned incentives. This offers a purposeful alternative.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
26/ For the second- imagine a coalition of the EU, Africa, the rest of the Americas, Asia, and Australia. It would have the spending power and talent to create a formidable, purposeful AI and robotics program.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
25/ The first greatly blunts the impact of lobbying and takes away power from corrupt career politicians. This allows enacting of citizen-friendly policies at a nation state level.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
24/Here is one possible way. It requires two pillars: strong, corruption-resistant national democracies (e.g., digital democracy & citizens’ assemblies), and a multinational democratic coalition with enough technological and economic power to act as a third force against the US-China duopoly.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
23/ This same dynamic paralyzes action at a nation-state level. If you as a country choose to be peaceful, but your neighbour is violent then you have no option but to militarise or develop AI and robotics even while sacrificing your population. This is the deadlock we must break.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
22/ The situation is compounded by the fact that a small but influential percentage of those upholding the status quo are not just constrained by game theory; they are individuals with low levels of empathy and self-centered worldviews—often shaped by trauma or genetic predisposition.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
21/ This is what leads to people building bunkers and making plans to escape to Mars instead of maximizing chances of survival here on Earth
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
20/ Again, this doesn't require evil. It's game theory. If you are willing to give up power to ensure planetary flourishing, but you think others won't, you are going to be too afraid to act alone. You would weaken your chances of survival for nothing.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
19/ This would require the powerful to give up some of their advantage. Some, like billionaires @mackenziescott.bsky.social and others who have signed the Giving Pledge, recognize this and are working towards it. But the others would rather let people perish instead of giving up their power.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
18/ Think massive investments in green tech and safe nuclear energy. An economy that focuses on human and planetary flourishing instead of profit maximisation. Tech that works for people and not against them.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
17/ Think life configured around public transportation, walking, and cycling instead of cars. Think tool libraries and equipment sharing instead of each person buying everything. Think healthcare focused on well-being instead of making money off sick people.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
16/ The planet, under our current wasteful and unequal infrastructure, cannot support 8.2 billion people. A good life for all is physically possible. But it requires a massive reorganisation of society.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
15/ The result— climate change, micro-plastics everywhere (including our brains), soil degradation compromising food production capability, water scarcity, plateauing/declining oil production that will lead to an energy crisis in the next decade, and more
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
14/ We have been doing this for decades now. But the effects had not been as evident because the Earth is massive. It had an excess of resources and an ecosystem that was self-correcting to an extent. Now we have ploughed through the surplus and gone beyond the limits of self-correction.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
13/ The game-theoretic incentive for these companies to let people perish is ecological. We are in a period of ecological overshoot—consuming resources faster than Earth can replenish.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
12/ That we depend on relationships to give life its richness, meaning and beauty. This blindness leads them to believe that power is the only truth worth worshipping.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
11/ It requires people to misunderstand Darwin and fail to see that we form an interconnected web of life. That survival of the fittest in our context means cooperation, not competition.
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM
10/ Unable to mount effective resistance, the masses made redundant face a grim fate. This doesn't require the powerful to be evil. It just requires game theory and a worldview that says, "The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must."
November 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM