@honey-and-feta.bsky.social
22, she/her. trying to figure it all out.
🩵🫧☺️
Philly Metro/Central Jersey (yes, it exists).
🩵🫧☺️
Philly Metro/Central Jersey (yes, it exists).
the wars reddit post, btw
October 21, 2025 at 2:41 PM
the wars reddit post, btw
the walmart thing is a reference to a tweet, not literal
October 16, 2025 at 4:20 PM
the walmart thing is a reference to a tweet, not literal
i don’t think they’re the same, just that it’s standard in a tos. everything from doordash to her own newsletter.
September 17, 2025 at 9:47 AM
i don’t think they’re the same, just that it’s standard in a tos. everything from doordash to her own newsletter.
this is standard legal boilerplate in a TOS, her own website has it.
September 17, 2025 at 3:28 AM
this is standard legal boilerplate in a TOS, her own website has it.
if they’re concerned, they shouldn’t be posting on here, either
September 17, 2025 at 3:21 AM
if they’re concerned, they shouldn’t be posting on here, either
if you’re on here, you can already be traced. it’s really not bumping up exposure.
September 17, 2025 at 3:14 AM
if you’re on here, you can already be traced. it’s really not bumping up exposure.
here, let me give another example of the thing she’s talking about
September 17, 2025 at 3:01 AM
here, let me give another example of the thing she’s talking about
better not keep using bluesky or sign up for her newsletter then
September 17, 2025 at 2:57 AM
better not keep using bluesky or sign up for her newsletter then
prob should stop posting here then
September 17, 2025 at 2:53 AM
prob should stop posting here then
she’s posting under her full government name on here, isn’t she? it’s standard legal boilerplate to my knowledge
September 17, 2025 at 2:52 AM
she’s posting under her full government name on here, isn’t she? it’s standard legal boilerplate to my knowledge
you helped, babe
September 10, 2025 at 8:39 PM
you helped, babe
i did, just forgot to post her admitting she misrepresented the “controlling subjects posted”. To be clear, I think it’s a bit shady, but her own standards implicate her. she doesn’t say she’s funded by 1630 even though another group (Omydar) she is affiliated with/paid by is funded by 1630 as well
September 1, 2025 at 4:30 AM
i did, just forgot to post her admitting she misrepresented the “controlling subjects posted”. To be clear, I think it’s a bit shady, but her own standards implicate her. she doesn’t say she’s funded by 1630 even though another group (Omydar) she is affiliated with/paid by is funded by 1630 as well
idk, she seems bought into the ideas
September 1, 2025 at 3:20 AM
idk, she seems bought into the ideas
also that she lied about the company controlling talking points
September 1, 2025 at 3:00 AM
also that she lied about the company controlling talking points
also, from one of the sources in the wiki article
August 17, 2025 at 6:16 PM
also, from one of the sources in the wiki article
dog fighting, illegal/unsanctioned gambling, and probably some statutes about interacting with wildlife
April 20, 2025 at 8:47 PM
dog fighting, illegal/unsanctioned gambling, and probably some statutes about interacting with wildlife
seems relevant
April 19, 2025 at 4:11 AM
seems relevant
Ah, it’s a reference to this old tweet about tough talking twitter revolutionaries
April 1, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Ah, it’s a reference to this old tweet about tough talking twitter revolutionaries