What Happened
@heherenow.bsky.social
Excess ain’t rebellion, you’re drinking what they’re selling.
This was in Foxboro though
December 2, 2025 at 4:52 AM
This was in Foxboro though
Is this ChatGPT or is this validated? Just curious as I recognize the little bar graph symbol. I am a researcher and have never seen this displayed in such a manner. Participation is far from congruent and things such as the availability of safety gear vary by nation for example.
December 2, 2025 at 4:45 AM
Is this ChatGPT or is this validated? Just curious as I recognize the little bar graph symbol. I am a researcher and have never seen this displayed in such a manner. Participation is far from congruent and things such as the availability of safety gear vary by nation for example.
I dunno man, the way Dart keeps staying upright in the field of play with a defender coming at him full speed makes me wonder…
December 2, 2025 at 4:21 AM
I dunno man, the way Dart keeps staying upright in the field of play with a defender coming at him full speed makes me wonder…
But he’s the Secretary of War so he can plead ignorance.
December 2, 2025 at 4:14 AM
But he’s the Secretary of War so he can plead ignorance.
No, no, not the one they liked particularly, just the one most people know. All that matters is being popular.
December 2, 2025 at 3:28 AM
No, no, not the one they liked particularly, just the one most people know. All that matters is being popular.
You did it, you summoned Country Music Superstar Tim McGraw, oh wait, Tom McGrath; my bad
December 2, 2025 at 3:18 AM
You did it, you summoned Country Music Superstar Tim McGraw, oh wait, Tom McGrath; my bad
All of this because James Franklin got fired?
December 2, 2025 at 1:59 AM
All of this because James Franklin got fired?
Probably because, well, you get it.
December 1, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Probably because, well, you get it.
It’s like The Truman Show except the main character has no redeeming qualities and you are cheering for him to lose.
December 1, 2025 at 5:04 PM
It’s like The Truman Show except the main character has no redeeming qualities and you are cheering for him to lose.
This is pretty much confirmed by the league office claiming to be a “highlights” league meaning you don’t actually need to watch the games. This of course was in response to a question about affordability, so get wealthy or continue to only watch clips.
November 30, 2025 at 3:33 PM
This is pretty much confirmed by the league office claiming to be a “highlights” league meaning you don’t actually need to watch the games. This of course was in response to a question about affordability, so get wealthy or continue to only watch clips.
Ding, ding, ding (it was racism)
November 30, 2025 at 3:10 PM
Ding, ding, ding (it was racism)
Same experience, still couldn’t get unanimous decision because “he probably did it.” But “he could also probably not have done it and it was one of the other 8 possible suspects” is called “reasonable doubt.”
November 30, 2025 at 3:01 PM
Same experience, still couldn’t get unanimous decision because “he probably did it.” But “he could also probably not have done it and it was one of the other 8 possible suspects” is called “reasonable doubt.”
Yes, using one of the greatest episodic television shows in history was always going to be problematic as an example. I’d counter that the answer to the “is he or isn’t he?” which was “huh?” is my point.
Out like the Smoke monster 💨
Out like the Smoke monster 💨
November 30, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Yes, using one of the greatest episodic television shows in history was always going to be problematic as an example. I’d counter that the answer to the “is he or isn’t he?” which was “huh?” is my point.
Out like the Smoke monster 💨
Out like the Smoke monster 💨
No doubt, it wasn’t meant to attack the writers, they are just doing their job. It just becomes obvious when a 3 season storyline is being stretched to 7.
November 30, 2025 at 2:46 PM
No doubt, it wasn’t meant to attack the writers, they are just doing their job. It just becomes obvious when a 3 season storyline is being stretched to 7.
Treating irrationality as rational is being irrational.
November 30, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Treating irrationality as rational is being irrational.
Cal is like that really smart friend who walks home from the store that he drove to.
November 30, 2025 at 1:57 PM
Cal is like that really smart friend who walks home from the store that he drove to.
If those kids could read, they’d be very upset…
November 30, 2025 at 1:49 PM
If those kids could read, they’d be very upset…
It happens a lot. The original idea isn’t being run by the idea have-r but a team of writers. Lost did the same thing, it got convoluted because it was more interested in making more episodes than telling a story. It’s one reason why people cut the cord, network TV started to suck.
November 30, 2025 at 12:26 PM
It happens a lot. The original idea isn’t being run by the idea have-r but a team of writers. Lost did the same thing, it got convoluted because it was more interested in making more episodes than telling a story. It’s one reason why people cut the cord, network TV started to suck.
Shit, in that case why not play here too?
November 30, 2025 at 3:37 AM
Shit, in that case why not play here too?
Why couldn’t it be blue vs burgundy?
November 30, 2025 at 2:05 AM
Why couldn’t it be blue vs burgundy?
He’s been in office since 2006. He states “I’d do something if I thought other people in my party would act.”
You’re right, so brave, so noble!
You’re right, so brave, so noble!
November 29, 2025 at 3:17 PM
He’s been in office since 2006. He states “I’d do something if I thought other people in my party would act.”
You’re right, so brave, so noble!
You’re right, so brave, so noble!
Yet he still ran as a Republican…
November 29, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Yet he still ran as a Republican…
Looks like a live action Ninja Turtles villain. Definitely a direct to VHS.
November 29, 2025 at 3:53 AM
Looks like a live action Ninja Turtles villain. Definitely a direct to VHS.
If it looks intentionally dirty even when you do it unintentionally, it should probably be illegal, I concur.
November 28, 2025 at 3:44 PM
If it looks intentionally dirty even when you do it unintentionally, it should probably be illegal, I concur.