Wow, I did not know this. That's a great feature.
It did come back to your original point... scrolling through the discovery queue it is pretty sad to see all the <25 review games. PCVR is hard work.

There is also a category "VR Titles" which has tabs for several genres.
There is a "VR Only" tag, and in Visuals & Viewpoint there is a "VR" tag.
The main annoyance on steam is that "more like this", "Discovery queue" don't seem to care that you play 90% VR games and mostly show flatscreen games.

Not worried, after 3 years I know I will not get enough sales to cover the cost of the project. I still know what to work on every day, most of the days I feel more productive than in my previous job. On the bright side, I still feel happy when I see a single added wishlist 🙂.

Thanks! Saw your post on playing Final Assault, which is a good VR strategy game.
Unoffensible leans more on VR by making all units physically movable. You will feel like your actions matter, you are not just watching the battle. Base/Unit building uses VR specific UI, so you are part of the game.

There is no reason for this code to exist, even without the error. The error was probably the only thing keeping the compiler from just removing the code in production 😜.

They are all solid games, well polished. The intuitive VR interactions and the freedom to pickup everything, make them nice to play for everyone.

Hope everyone finds a new job within VR. There is not a lot of brain to drain from the VR development pool, before it runs dry. And these studios should have been able to leverage their experience in VR to push it forward.

With the hands so clearly in view I always think this is a VR game from the trailer. Don't think there is VR support. Looks like a fun little game though.

VR needs more RTS. Can't wait to give this a go.

True, watching playtesters hurts 😅.

Great overview, nice to see some new RTS games!