Spot the problem(s): you have a numerical technique A for quantum systems that is not variational, you apply it to system X, then compare it to a variational method B previously applied to system Y and you extrapolate it to X. Then, you claim that method B has lower energies than A!

We had fun arguing 🤺 about the prospects of near-term quantum computing in Lapland/Oxford

In arxiv.org/abs/2501.05694 we frame our (reasonably converged) conclusions around common 'myths' concerning error mitigation, VQAs, resource estimates and potential applications

Feedback/discussion welcomed!

(1/n) Excited to finally share our new paper to study quantum dynamics with neural quantum states: "Time-dependent Neural Galerkin Method for Quantum Dynamics" with A Sinibaldi, @philipvinc.bsky.social and D Hendry.
arxiv.org/pdf/2412.11778

when the paper will be published (multilayered data set of a first person shooter, Alien vs Predator (99), end to end speech to text translation) she'll be of course co-authored, even if it's in one thousand years, so to speak.
Here's what I think of her :

For the little story, she's specialized in multimodal stuff and worked with me in my Alien vs Predator data set project. She hit a wall when she found out that the transcription were screwed up af so we decided to redo the transcription from scratch but she had to leave before they were finished :(

#NLPproc #NLP Guys, I have a former super student of mine, now in a master at MILA, looking for an internship in some big lab company. She did a 6 months internship with me, 6 month at the EPFL sites.google.com/view/rishika....
She's so great, I can't believe pp are simply ignoring her mails :(