Fabian Krougman
@fkrougman.bsky.social
Advocate (defender of solicitors and barristers), Mediator and co-author of The law and Practice of Private Prosecutions.
Law, reading, violin, fountain pens, doglover and history.
https://fabiankrougman.com/regulatory-and-professional-discipline
Law, reading, violin, fountain pens, doglover and history.
https://fabiankrougman.com/regulatory-and-professional-discipline
I need to come… so shall travel to Oxford in February.. when I am down…
November 28, 2025 at 9:09 AM
I need to come… so shall travel to Oxford in February.. when I am down…
I shall take this suggestion on board and put it in an annex of the book
June 24, 2025 at 8:37 AM
I shall take this suggestion on board and put it in an annex of the book
Reposted by Fabian Krougman
Birdsong awakens the misty glade,
Soft sunbeams dance through trees.
Let nature's calm serenade
B...
Photo by Gary Fultz on Unsplash
Soft sunbeams dance through trees.
Let nature's calm serenade
B...
Photo by Gary Fultz on Unsplash
April 19, 2025 at 8:11 AM
Birdsong awakens the misty glade,
Soft sunbeams dance through trees.
Let nature's calm serenade
B...
Photo by Gary Fultz on Unsplash
Soft sunbeams dance through trees.
Let nature's calm serenade
B...
Photo by Gary Fultz on Unsplash
Reposted by Fabian Krougman
Great stuff. Careful only to use this when corresponding with other NeoAssyrians lest they get offended by the order of gods...
March 13, 2025 at 10:18 AM
Great stuff. Careful only to use this when corresponding with other NeoAssyrians lest they get offended by the order of gods...
Of course my friend
December 1, 2024 at 8:21 PM
Of course my friend
Reposted by Fabian Krougman
Yes. Released on appeal. But the fact that there are miscarriages of justice, and flawed 'experts', does not make every conviction unsafe.
September 13, 2024 at 1:07 PM
Yes. Released on appeal. But the fact that there are miscarriages of justice, and flawed 'experts', does not make every conviction unsafe.
Reposted by Fabian Krougman
If you view is 1. then you really, really need more cogent reasons than 'they didn't call expert X to give evidence'. And also explain why that outweighed the rest of the evidence that the jury heard.
September 12, 2024 at 8:50 PM
If you view is 1. then you really, really need more cogent reasons than 'they didn't call expert X to give evidence'. And also explain why that outweighed the rest of the evidence that the jury heard.
Reposted by Fabian Krougman
'Why didn't the defence call expert X who could have shown reasonable doubt?'. 2.5 options. 1 The highly skilled and experienced defence were negligent. 2. The expert would not have helped the defence so was not called. 2.5 the expert would have been demolished in cross examination so not called.
September 12, 2024 at 8:48 PM
'Why didn't the defence call expert X who could have shown reasonable doubt?'. 2.5 options. 1 The highly skilled and experienced defence were negligent. 2. The expert would not have helped the defence so was not called. 2.5 the expert would have been demolished in cross examination so not called.