Financial History Review
banner
fhrjournal.bsky.social
Financial History Review
@fhrjournal.bsky.social
The Review seeks to embrace a broad approach to financial, banking, and monetary history, which appeals to a wide audience of historians and economists.

Website: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/financial-history-review
New research studies depositor behavior after hurricanes. The findings are that there is no strong evidence of precautionary saving. Balances and deposits fell, but so did withdrawals and account closures. Small savers weren’t driving the decline.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
February 27, 2025 at 2:41 AM
Was gold trading efficient when it was the backbone of the monetary system? New research reconstructs daily London Gold Fixing prices (1919–1968) & tests market efficiency: Gold was inefficient when prices were market-driven and under central bank intervention.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
February 27, 2025 at 2:41 AM
Did policymakers neglect monetary policy? While money supply experiments began in the late '60s, a nonmonetary view of inflation dominated early '70s decision-making—until money targets gained traction later in the decade.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
February 1, 2025 at 4:27 PM
Unlike Western Europe, Spain shifted from city-based money markets to central banking without a nationwide banking system. New data reveals price formation, market asymmetries & why lower transaction costs didn’t mean greater efficiency.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
February 1, 2025 at 4:27 PM
Does democratization lower foreign borrowing costs? 📉📈 This study revisits the question using improved panel event study methods. Findings? The effect is uncertain—estimates are either statistically insignificant or hover around zero.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
February 1, 2025 at 4:27 PM