Emily Ford
@femilyr.bsky.social
Open science. Open peer review. Open access. Librarian by training. Former union leader. And cats. Current work as Director of the Open Research Funders Group, an initiative of SPARC. Opinions my own.
So rad to get to hang out with cool open science nerds and preprint enthusiasts this week. ✨✨✨
@openaccessmaven.bsky.social @madubs.bsky.social @kristenratan.bsky.social
@openaccessmaven.bsky.social @madubs.bsky.social @kristenratan.bsky.social
October 24, 2025 at 3:24 PM
So rad to get to hang out with cool open science nerds and preprint enthusiasts this week. ✨✨✨
@openaccessmaven.bsky.social @madubs.bsky.social @kristenratan.bsky.social
@openaccessmaven.bsky.social @madubs.bsky.social @kristenratan.bsky.social
LOLZ. The comments on this thread. But will corporate oligarchs and scaredy pants CEOs pay attention to scientific evidence and do what's good for workers? 🤔 #latestagecapitalism
July 22, 2025 at 7:44 PM
LOLZ. The comments on this thread. But will corporate oligarchs and scaredy pants CEOs pay attention to scientific evidence and do what's good for workers? 🤔 #latestagecapitalism
Thanks for explaining that. I haven't lived in the back end world that deeply.
June 17, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Thanks for explaining that. I haven't lived in the back end world that deeply.
1. Nice step forward 2. reviewers may still opt to remain anonymous. That's not transparent. 3. A future progression should be using DOIs for the review products (like F1000Research is doing). 4. Not sure I understand the cost implications, since this work is being done anyway??
June 17, 2025 at 5:14 PM
1. Nice step forward 2. reviewers may still opt to remain anonymous. That's not transparent. 3. A future progression should be using DOIs for the review products (like F1000Research is doing). 4. Not sure I understand the cost implications, since this work is being done anyway??