Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter
LightNews LightNews
banner
ezequielfk.bsky.social
Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter
@ezequielfk.bsky.social
4 followers 41 following 0 posts
Soy investigador y docente en Ciencias del Comportamiento, y adhiero a los principios, valores y prácticas en Ciencia Abierta.
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter
breznaunate.bsky.social
Wanna do #openscience and get credit for it in your career? Try a #replication at @i4replication.bsky.social i4replication.org. You will contribute to better science, build your skills and get a CV item.
November 11, 2025 at 9:07 AM
Reposted by Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter
andrew.heiss.phd
I recently discovered Conventional Comments (conventionalcomments.org) for providing a pseudo-standard set of labels for feedback and just tried it for an article review and it was really helpful to specify issues vs. thoughts vs. suggestions, etc. Hopefully it's helpful for the authors too!
We strongly suggest using the following labels: praise: Praises highlight something positive. Try to leave at least one of these comments per review. Do not leave false praise (which can actually be damaging). Do look for something to sincerely praise. nitpick: Nitpicks are trivial preference-based requests. These should be non-blocking by nature. suggestion: Suggestions propose improvements to the current subject. It’s important to be explicit and clear on what is being suggested and why it is an improvement. Consider using patches and the blocking or non-blocking decorations to further communicate your intent. issue: Issues highlight specific problems with the subject under review. These problems can be user-facing or behind the scenes. It is strongly recommended to pair this comment with a suggestion. If you are not sure if a problem exists or not, consider leaving a question. todo: TODO’s are small, trivial, but necessary changes. Distinguishing todo comments from issues: or suggestions: helps direct the reader’s attention to comments requiring more involvement. question: Questions are appropriate if you have a potential concern but are not quite sure if it’s relevant or not. Asking the author for clarification or investigation can lead to a quick resolution. thought: Thoughts represent an idea that popped up from reviewing. These comments are non-blocking by nature, but they are extremely valuable and can lead to more focused initiatives and mentoring opportunities. chore: Chores are simple tasks that must be done before the subject can be “officially” accepted. Usually, these comments reference some common process. Try to leave a link to the process description so that the reader knows how to resolve the chore. note: Notes are always non-blocking and simply highlight something the reader should take note of.
November 17, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Reposted by Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter
cghlewis.bsky.social
Issue 22 of RDM Weekly is out! 📬

- FAIR Data Cheatsheet @w-u-r.bsky.social
- Open Research: Examples of Good Practice, and Resources Across Disciplines @ukrepro.bsky.social
- 3 Myths About Open Science That Just Won’t Die @syeducation.bsky.social
and more!

rdmweekly.substack.com/p/rdm-weekly...
RDM Weekly - Issue 022
A weekly roundup of Research Data Management resources.
rdmweekly.substack.com
November 18, 2025 at 2:22 PM
Reposted by Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter
lyndamk.bsky.social
I'm looking forward to more discussions & actions we can take with this new initiative. Safeguarding scientific data requires coordinated initiative across many sectors. @datarescueproject.org has been a critical component in building community responses, and there is still much to be done.
November 18, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Reposted by Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter
syeducation.bsky.social
I made a whole doctoral-level assignment about the problems of reporting in meta-analysis (among other problems), called a "reverse meta-analysis." 14/14 students found some kind of errors, some of them major! docs.google.com/document/d/1...
PSY 8121 Fall 2024 Reverse Meta-Analysis Project
PSY 8121: History and Methods of Psychology - Fall 2024 Reverse Meta-Analysis Project You will not conduct a meta-analysis in this class. You will take one apart, deconstruct it, reverse it. Meta-an...
docs.google.com
November 15, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Reposted by Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter
wesbonifay.bsky.social
Announcement: I am excited to be co-editing (with Li Cai) an upcoming Special Issue of the Journal of Mathematical Psychology on "Advances in Statistical Model Evaluation." Proposals due Feb 1. Details: www.sciencedirect.com/special-issu...

Please repost!

#quantpsych #mathpsych #philsci #statsky
Advances in Statistical Model Evaluation Submission deadline: 31 December 2026 The Special Issue accepts theoretical, methodological, applied, and philosophically oriented research on frequentist, Bayesian, and information-theoretic advances in statistical model evaluation. Topics of interest for this call for papers include but are not restricted to: • Methodological advances in fit assessment, parametric bootstrapping, cross-validation, and/or other frequentist model evaluation methods • Methodological advances in prior and/or posterior predictive model checking, specification and use of informed priors, Bayes factors, and/or other Bayesian model evaluation • Methodological advances in minimum description length, normalized maximum likelihood, and/or other information-theoretic model evaluation methods • Practical applications and tutorials of advanced model evaluation methods • Philosophy of science issues underlying statistical model evaluation • Critiques/perspectives/commentaries on statistical model evaluation
November 18, 2025 at 6:18 PM
Reposted by Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter
lakens.bsky.social
My Shiny app containing 3530 Open Science blog posts discussing the replication crisis is updated - you can now use the SEARCH box. I fixed it as my new PhD Julia wanted to know who had called open scientists 'Methodological Terrorists' :) shiny.ieis.tue.nl/open_science...
Open Science Blog Browser
Open Science Blog Browser
shiny.ieis.tue.nl
November 8, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Reposted by Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter
pipinghotdata.com
The recording of my #rstats posit::conf talk ✨ practical {renv}✨ is available! 🎉

I created this talk for frustrated {renv} users 🫠 and potential {renv} users🤩

youtu.be/l01u7Ue9pIQ?...

Even if {renv} isn't on your radar, you may still find this talk interesting if you are curious about🤔...
Practical {renv} (Shannon Pileggi, The PCCTC) | posit::conf(2025)
YouTube video by Posit PBC
youtu.be
November 11, 2025 at 1:32 PM
Reposted by Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter
briannosek.bsky.social
Ericsson & Simon (1980) takes the middle cell psycnet.apa.org/record/1980-...

Now, your nominations for minimal citation impact but moderate actual impact?

A contribution that altered policy or practice...
A paper that extinguished an active area of research...
An uncredited gem...
November 11, 2025 at 1:28 PM
Reposted by Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter
jessiebaldwin.bsky.social
How many preregistered studies end up in the file drawer? 🗂️

Join us to find out from Eline Ensinck at the next ReproducibiliTea!

📅Nov 25, 3pm GMT

www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/are-prereg...

@tabeasch.bsky.social @reproducibilitea.org @uclopenscience.bsky.social @ukrepro.bsky.social @lakens.bsky.social
Are Preregistered Studies Publicly Shared? With Eline Ensinck
Eline Ensinck will present research on the number of preregistered studies which are never published and the reasons behind this
www.eventbrite.co.uk
November 11, 2025 at 1:02 PM
Reposted by Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter
psych.peercommunityin.org
PCI Psychology is open for submissions! Did you know that you can easily submit your recommended preprint to any of the 20+ PCI Psych friendly journals? See all friendly journals here: psych.peercommunityin.org/about/pci_fr...
#PsychSciSky #SciPub
November 11, 2025 at 9:46 PM