Eric Todd
@ericwtodd.bsky.social
CS PhD Student, Northeastern University - Machine Learning, Interpretability https://ericwtodd.github.io
I'm not familiar with the reviewing load for ARR, but for COLM this I was only assigned 2 papers as a reviewer which is great. I had more time to try and understand each submission and it was much more manageable than getting assigned 6+ papers like ICML and NeurIPS do.
May 29, 2025 at 12:14 AM
I'm not familiar with the reviewing load for ARR, but for COLM this I was only assigned 2 papers as a reviewer which is great. I had more time to try and understand each submission and it was much more manageable than getting assigned 6+ papers like ICML and NeurIPS do.
I reviewed for ICML this year and it felt to me like the paper quality was lower than previous reviewing assignments I’ve had. In my batch I had 3/7 that I’d consider low quality submissions. The review process was also more involved (but hopefully it allows for a better feedback mechanism)
March 25, 2025 at 10:06 PM
I reviewed for ICML this year and it felt to me like the paper quality was lower than previous reviewing assignments I’ve had. In my batch I had 3/7 that I’d consider low quality submissions. The review process was also more involved (but hopefully it allows for a better feedback mechanism)