I dunno man, but if I wanted people to trust moderators and I had just suspended an enemy of the regime, I'd be REAL EFFING SURE people understood why I'd suspended her.

Pretty disingenuous to ask, "Could it not be...?" Sure, it could. But in a time of relentlessly rising, violent govt crackdowns on civilian populations (waves from Chicago where they've teargassed elementary schools, pepper sprayed toddlers, broken ribs & killed people) this ban is a huge red flag.

Gonna be pretty hard to take you people seriously when you’re banning journalists.

Good work undermining yourselves.

“I’m an unimaginative writer who is out of ideas” is a weird flex but okay.

Who is this for? Who are you talking to right now that doesn’t know this? Are you saying this to the cave caucus?

Either you’re calling for Schumer to step down or you accept your share of the blame.

Announce you’re gonna primary Schumer today and you’ll have $10,000,000 in small dollar donations by tomorrow.

Didn’t he promise to move to Florida if he lost?

I probably could have been more clear, though.

"Clearer" has a real "rural juror" mouthfeel, you know?

And as well I suspect Mamdani in particular understands that game too well to let it slow him down.

My kingdom for the reporter who follows up an exchange like this with a pointed response about how if he does not know who he pardoned then he is definitionally “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office” per the 25th amendment.

MattY engage with empirical reality challenge (impossible)