The article is available at: scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol75/is...

Although the Constitution offers some protection against state-inflicted violence, the scope of protection hinges on one’s legal status rather than applying uniformly to all. Professor Danielle Jefferis considers this unequal protection in her article.

Check out the entire issue on ELJ's website: scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol74/is...

Thomas Furlong wrote "The Revolution Continues: Revitalizing the Implied Warranty of Habitability with Presumed General Damages."

Issue 6 also features two comments from @emorylaw.bsky.social alums. Maguire Tausch, Executive Managing Editor for Volume 74, penned "Defying Goldilocks: Why the FLSA Collective Action Notice Standard Set Forth in Lusardi is 'Just Right.'"

It features pieces from @orlylobel.bsky.social, @ariezra.bsky.social, Aleksander Goranin, @matthewsag.bsky.social, Peter K. Yu, @jessicasilbey.bsky.social, @nicholson.bsky.social, and @saragerke.bsky.social!

This issue is full of interesting pieces covering a plethora of artificial intelligence issues, including privacy, healthcare, art, copyright, and more!

Check out the full piece in ELJ: scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol74/is...

In "Access or Sovereignty," Professor Holden contends that a legislative update could level the playing field—allowing tribes to compete online and securing a $40 billion industry that supports hundreds of communities.

Some tribes have sacrificed sovereignty for access, while others have refused. But, Professor Holden argues, none should be forced into such a choice.

Professor John Holden considers in ELJ.

Although the tribal gaming industry once flourished, it now stands at a crossroads. A key legal restriction—that all gaming must occur on “Indian lands”—prevents tribes from expanding into the online market, as commercial operators do so.

Kayla O'Brien is a Managing Editor of ELJ and @emorylaw.bsky.social Class of 2025. Her comment "Health Is Wealth: Strengthening Plaintiffs’ Ability to Confer Standing in Health Information Data Breach Cases" was recently published in ELJ. Check it out: scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol74/is...

She critiques courts’ limited interpretation of injury-in-fact and advocates for a more comprehensive approach that encompasses both economic and noneconomic harms. Kayla also proposes reforms to strengthen privacy protections, offering insights into the challenges of securing health information.

Kayla’s article explores the challenges data breach victims face conferring standing in federal court, particularly when the compromised data includes health information.

Individuals’ health information is increasingly at risk of data breaches as healthcare providers and individuals use digital devices and applications more frequently to log health data.