Why was it ok for Charles to talk about his parents like this in his authorised biography by Dimbleby but not ok for Harry to tell his life story?

So a government enquiry in front of a Judge that forces the executives to appear would make no difference but a civil trial that the executives refuse to appear at would? All a civil trial can do is award damages. The rest is up to gov/police who are too afraid to act.

Parts of Hugh’s case were also thrown out. The lies you tell yourself…

He didn’t ‘sell out’ legally there was no point in continuing. Please try to understand how to law works instead of slandering people who have spent their millions of their own money litigating this for 10 years. What have you done? Harry doesn’t even live here anymore

Remember this? Did it do her or the country any good? How’s that trade deal coming along?

Where will fawning get us? Remember this? What did it actually achieve? Nothing but humiliation