Extremely normal stuff coming from an extremely normal party.
Extremely normal stuff coming from an extremely normal party.
For instance (examples are made up), someone might read/write: “Epstein is kryptonite to Trump. He was convicted and committed suicide in prison.” Here the pronoun is a problem.
For instance (examples are made up), someone might read/write: “Epstein is kryptonite to Trump. He was convicted and committed suicide in prison.” Here the pronoun is a problem.
For instance (these examples are made up), someone might read/write: “Epstein is kryptonite to Trump. He was convicted and committed suicide in prison.” Here the pronoun is a problem.
For instance (these examples are made up), someone might read/write: “Epstein is kryptonite to Trump. He was convicted and committed suicide in prison.” Here the pronoun is a problem.
My examples are insignificant. But in complex political material, is this inattention to style—in this case the order of ideas and words—simply carelessness, or something more? A craze? A political tactic? Or rhetorical insanity on my part? Words matter; so does word order.
My examples are insignificant. But in complex political material, is this inattention to style—in this case the order of ideas and words—simply carelessness, or something more? A craze? A political tactic? Or rhetorical insanity on my part? Words matter; so does word order.
This problem is endemic, particularly in the so-called “legacy media”— newspapers, written and reviewed, and television news, much on teleprompters, and thus written. Oral speech is excusable, but not written text, which can be reviewed and revised. It’s driving me nuts!
This problem is endemic, particularly in the so-called “legacy media”— newspapers, written and reviewed, and television news, much on teleprompters, and thus written. Oral speech is excusable, but not written text, which can be reviewed and revised. It’s driving me nuts!
Or: “She was interviewed in prison, talking for two days.” This is a more classical dangling modifier.
Or: “She was interviewed in prison, talking for two days.” This is a more classical dangling modifier.
For instance (examples are made up), someone might read/write: “Epstein is kryptonite to Trump. He was convicted and committed suicide in prison.” Here the pronoun is a problem.
For instance (examples are made up), someone might read/write: “Epstein is kryptonite to Trump. He was convicted and committed suicide in prison.” Here the pronoun is a problem.
Is there some connection between the political situation, esp. re media, and misplaced or ambiguous modifiers
Is there some connection between the political situation, esp. re media, and misplaced or ambiguous modifiers
youtube.com/watch?v=VdPD...
youtube.com/watch?v=VdPD...
An important step (if so many dances) in restoring American democracy 🇺🇸
An important step (if so many dances) in restoring American democracy 🇺🇸
adamkinzinger.substack.com/p/saving-the...
adamkinzinger.substack.com/p/saving-the...
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Follow Democracy Docket for details. www.democracydocket.com
Follow Democracy Docket for details. www.democracydocket.com