David 🇨🇦
@drod425.bsky.social
ChatGPT probably just really likes the name tbh.
November 13, 2025 at 11:23 PM
ChatGPT probably just really likes the name tbh.
November 13, 2025 at 5:16 AM
500 years from now scholars will be arguing over who this refers to, and whether it's 1 person or 3
November 13, 2025 at 4:57 AM
500 years from now scholars will be arguing over who this refers to, and whether it's 1 person or 3
"pres king pm" is art
November 13, 2025 at 4:56 AM
"pres king pm" is art
November 13, 2025 at 4:45 AM
His substack, medium, and twitter accounts all went dark in March, 2023. His linkedin says he's freelance from 2019-current, but has no recent activity.
November 13, 2025 at 4:24 AM
His substack, medium, and twitter accounts all went dark in March, 2023. His linkedin says he's freelance from 2019-current, but has no recent activity.
Their reporters were tipping him off from their work emails when other journalists were investigating around!
bsky.app/profile/chri...
bsky.app/profile/chri...
Fall 2017: Then-NYT reporter literally warning Epstein that someone is "digging around again."
![From:
Thomas Jr., Landon
Sent:
9/27/2017 2:47:47 PM
To:
Subject:
Got another call from Connelly..
Importance:
High
Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
He is digging around again -- not clear if its another book/or expanded paperback version. Was asking me all sorts of questions about why you hired Ken Starr. I told him I had no idea - I think he is doing some Trump-related digging too.
Anyway, for what its worth...
Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_ir thomas/index.h
tml](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreia6463yzmb2suqn5rbfslvtta667av3ryynaetbsl7x6tniezyawu@jpeg)
November 13, 2025 at 4:21 AM
Their reporters were tipping him off from their work emails when other journalists were investigating around!
bsky.app/profile/chri...
bsky.app/profile/chri...
Thomas Massie to CNN on the Epstein files: "This vote is gonna be on your record for longer than Trump is gonna be president. And what are you gonna do in 2028 and 2030 when you're in a debate … and they say, 'How can we trust you? You covered up for a pedophile back in 2025.'"
November 13, 2025 at 4:05 AM
November 12, 2025 at 9:10 PM
Warner still has no primary opponent despite being the best establishment target of the cycle. Who are they supposed to be afraid of?
November 10, 2025 at 7:37 AM
Warner still has no primary opponent despite being the best establishment target of the cycle. Who are they supposed to be afraid of?
I think it's clear that despite the US not being a parliamentary system, the founders would have thought that congress denying supply to an overreaching executive would be acceptable, if not laudatory.
This is Charles I checks & balances that they understood clearly.
This is Charles I checks & balances that they understood clearly.
November 10, 2025 at 6:26 AM
I think it's clear that despite the US not being a parliamentary system, the founders would have thought that congress denying supply to an overreaching executive would be acceptable, if not laudatory.
This is Charles I checks & balances that they understood clearly.
This is Charles I checks & balances that they understood clearly.
If you cast the deciding vote against your own leadership, and the majority of your caucus on a major bill, then you simply cannot be the whip.
The entire job is stopping that 60th vote defecting. And if Schumer isn't trying to replace him, he's endorsing the defection.
The entire job is stopping that 60th vote defecting. And if Schumer isn't trying to replace him, he's endorsing the defection.
November 10, 2025 at 5:21 AM
If you cast the deciding vote against your own leadership, and the majority of your caucus on a major bill, then you simply cannot be the whip.
The entire job is stopping that 60th vote defecting. And if Schumer isn't trying to replace him, he's endorsing the defection.
The entire job is stopping that 60th vote defecting. And if Schumer isn't trying to replace him, he's endorsing the defection.
Either he couldn't keep Durbin (his own whip) onside, or he gave Durbin permission to vote yes. Either one means the end of the current leadership.
November 10, 2025 at 5:05 AM
Either he couldn't keep Durbin (his own whip) onside, or he gave Durbin permission to vote yes. Either one means the end of the current leadership.
Does Warner even have a primary challenger?
November 10, 2025 at 4:34 AM
Does Warner even have a primary challenger?
They wanted a flight home for Thanksgiving.
November 10, 2025 at 4:21 AM
They wanted a flight home for Thanksgiving.
If the ranking #2 dem is not "leadership" then what do you mean by leadership? Just Schumer?
November 10, 2025 at 4:15 AM
If the ranking #2 dem is not "leadership" then what do you mean by leadership? Just Schumer?
And if Durbin defected without permission *as the caucus whip* then the caucus should be unified in removing him from that position without debate tonight.
November 10, 2025 at 4:13 AM
And if Durbin defected without permission *as the caucus whip* then the caucus should be unified in removing him from that position without debate tonight.
Durbin is the whip and he voted for it. You can't say leadership opposed it.
November 10, 2025 at 4:10 AM
Durbin is the whip and he voted for it. You can't say leadership opposed it.
"The unitary executive has the power to fire executive branch employees, and congress can't block them with a bill" easily has 5 votes
November 10, 2025 at 3:48 AM
"The unitary executive has the power to fire executive branch employees, and congress can't block them with a bill" easily has 5 votes
Durbin at least should be a no-brainer to remove from leadership. You can't be the Whip and also join defectors on a major vote.
November 10, 2025 at 2:21 AM
Durbin at least should be a no-brainer to remove from leadership. You can't be the Whip and also join defectors on a major vote.
Reports that Lee and Johnson are doing their own negotiations with Thune to sign on.
November 10, 2025 at 2:06 AM
Reports that Lee and Johnson are doing their own negotiations with Thune to sign on.
Schatz is reportedly a no
November 10, 2025 at 1:18 AM
Schatz is reportedly a no
Yup the caucus is still trying to protect the squishies.
November 10, 2025 at 12:43 AM
Yup the caucus is still trying to protect the squishies.