There is a demo, and I'm going to try to also update the demo a bit before release if there's time, but my checklist of things left to do is still a bit much.

store.steampowered.com/app/2906550/...

I'm overthinking it at this point. I guess really if you're going to subscribe to a blocklist, just check who's making it and make sure it's someone you trust, and even if some bad actors exist in the system it doesn't make the system bad.

That is true. With that said, someone could try to overload a T&S team by just making bots that make random block lists too, I'm not sure how to solve something like that, but hopefully nobody tries to do that.

And that's assuming that the accounts that need to be moderated are even people. We're at the start of an era of strange tangles of wires that aren't real but can talk just like us.

That's super valid. I think a lot of technical people like me tend to think how the software can handle it and forget that the real solution is in the hands of a Trust and Safety team.

Do you think there's any reasonable technical solution to this? Blocklists being immutable (only blocks who's on it at the time you subscribe) or maybe asking you to verify when new accounts are added (tedious to end users)?

Maybe they can pay their shareholders in exposure?

Design is also a good example of fumble around and find out. Sometimes things that sound good aren't, things that sound bad are actually fun, and things that worked in one context spoil another.

I'm pretty sure Steam didn't really even look at my game, the only thing they got back to me on was my screenshots being the wrong resolution, which makes me think the process is done by code, not a human at all. Meanwhile, I've heard horror stories about console publishing.

I rather liked it, it felt like it was a lot less about being weird and a lot more about being whimsical.