Dominique Maciejewski 🟥
@domimaciejewski.bsky.social
Assistant Prof @Tilburg University | ESM studies, emotion (regulation) dynamics, mixed-methods, measurement, developmental psychopathology | check out our "Measurement is the new black" consortium www.mitnb.org
We made new friends and will work in the upcoming year on the different hackathons. Buckle up for the work that'll come out from the #mitnb consortium in the coming year. And if you wanna know more, find us on www.mitnb.org (4/4)
@tesc-tilburgu.bsky.social
@tesc-tilburgu.bsky.social
Measurement Is The New Black
We are a group of scientists interested in improving the validity of time-series measurement in social sciences.
www.mitnb.org
November 7, 2025 at 6:24 PM
We made new friends and will work in the upcoming year on the different hackathons. Buckle up for the work that'll come out from the #mitnb consortium in the coming year. And if you wanna know more, find us on www.mitnb.org (4/4)
@tesc-tilburgu.bsky.social
@tesc-tilburgu.bsky.social
Importantly, we did our best to create a friendly environment for everyone ranging from PhD students to associate profs. We went on walks in the forest, to a karaoke bar and an escape room together. I truly believe that these activities contribute to strong, fun and productive collaborations. (3/4)
November 7, 2025 at 6:24 PM
Importantly, we did our best to create a friendly environment for everyone ranging from PhD students to associate profs. We went on walks in the forest, to a karaoke bar and an escape room together. I truly believe that these activities contribute to strong, fun and productive collaborations. (3/4)
We had hackathons that set up a formal model for measurement, others that compared Likert and VAS scales within participants, yet others coupling processes across multiple timescales. We had quant and quali people, large studies and single case designs, formal models and empirical data (2/3)
November 7, 2025 at 6:24 PM
We had hackathons that set up a formal model for measurement, others that compared Likert and VAS scales within participants, yet others coupling processes across multiple timescales. We had quant and quali people, large studies and single case designs, formal models and empirical data (2/3)
Yes, I'm sure there's a big overlap in participants 🤗
November 3, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Yes, I'm sure there's a big overlap in participants 🤗
But we're still finishing up coding (since everything is coded independently by 2 coders and then we're doing a consensus for each participant). We have in total around 4000 responses on the question "how did you choose your response of (number) for (emotion)?" (2/2)
October 14, 2025 at 5:44 AM
But we're still finishing up coding (since everything is coded independently by 2 coders and then we're doing a consensus for each participant). We have in total around 4000 responses on the question "how did you choose your response of (number) for (emotion)?" (2/2)
That's still something we need to dig deeper, because the question is also what's a *meaningful* difference. So far, from my observation is that there are certain types of people with regard to what they base their ratings on. Sometimes they're consistent, sometimes it changes. (1/2)
October 14, 2025 at 5:44 AM
That's still something we need to dig deeper, because the question is also what's a *meaningful* difference. So far, from my observation is that there are certain types of people with regard to what they base their ratings on. Sometimes they're consistent, sometimes it changes. (1/2)
Hi Alex, thanks for reaching out! Sounds cool! I have someone else that did work on using different rating scales for the same construct to look at psychometric properties and see what people liked better.
Could you email me with more info, I'm very curious :)
D.f.maciejewski@tilburguniversity.edu
Could you email me with more info, I'm very curious :)
D.f.maciejewski@tilburguniversity.edu
October 13, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Hi Alex, thanks for reaching out! Sounds cool! I have someone else that did work on using different rating scales for the same construct to look at psychometric properties and see what people liked better.
Could you email me with more info, I'm very curious :)
D.f.maciejewski@tilburguniversity.edu
Could you email me with more info, I'm very curious :)
D.f.maciejewski@tilburguniversity.edu
Thank you ♥️
Same!
Same!
October 13, 2025 at 11:42 AM
Thank you ♥️
Same!
Same!
Omg they are not...I'll literally have different people saying they are not nervous at all, but then some rate 0, some a 2, some a 4 (scale 0-10). Also, people draw on so much different time frames for their ratings (very often not current events inform their rating but the past and future).
October 13, 2025 at 11:30 AM
Omg they are not...I'll literally have different people saying they are not nervous at all, but then some rate 0, some a 2, some a 4 (scale 0-10). Also, people draw on so much different time frames for their ratings (very often not current events inform their rating but the past and future).
Omg I loved that show! (And found it quite creepy when I was 8)
September 27, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Omg I loved that show! (And found it quite creepy when I was 8)
Congrats, that's awesome 🎉🎉🎉
September 22, 2025 at 7:49 PM
Congrats, that's awesome 🎉🎉🎉
Just last week we talked about whether this is already out! Looks really cool, thanks for sharing.
@leonievogelsmeier.bsky.social, we discussed this during the reading group!
@leonievogelsmeier.bsky.social, we discussed this during the reading group!
September 22, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Just last week we talked about whether this is already out! Looks really cool, thanks for sharing.
@leonievogelsmeier.bsky.social, we discussed this during the reading group!
@leonievogelsmeier.bsky.social, we discussed this during the reading group!
Ohhhh it's finally out. Nice! Can't wait to read it
September 22, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Ohhhh it's finally out. Nice! Can't wait to read it