Speakers will identify how AI can be utilized to enhance weather and climate simulations and models, highlight the overarching technical challenges associated with integrating AI, and explore the most promising applications.

Yeah this is confusing for liberals ... We want fun control but not like this!

I'm sorry to hear this

Cool side fact: Working Group 1 assesses the physical science of climate change. The US has 15 authors in WG1, 10 of whom are women. In the last report, 6/25 US scientists in WG1 were women. Woop Woop 💪🏼, although it's a shame to see the reduced # of US scientists involved this time around. End 🧵

Because the US State Dept is no longer supporting American involvement in the IPCC, @agu.org and the US Academic Alliance stepped up to nominate 282 experts, from which 37 were selected. (A few more were nominated by other means.) Thanks guys! 🙏🏼

In this time of attacks on climate science in the US, it's important to point out that the IPCC does not set policy, but it provides scientific assessments that form one part of decision making.

This will be my first time participating as a lead author. I've been fascinated by the work of the IPCC and its role in informing climate policy for years, and inspired by those who have served before, so this is a huge honor for me.

Erm, make that a *refutation* 🙄

I'd like to know more about a collective reputation of the report, as mentioned in this article.

Just one example of the misrepresentations in the report, I've seen many similar reports www.wired.com/story/scient...

Hi Neil, I've been thinking of looking at climate patterns for Georgia in my data science class, is the code you use for these graphs something you could share? My Exeter email address still works if so and you don't mind.

A few quick takes:

- the 'critical review' features a number of pretty standard and rebunked tropes.
- Spencer's 2024 (un-peer-reviewed) report for Heritage features strongly - and that was a hot mess of picked cherries: www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar...

The NYT article on this says it will be open to public comments, I'm sure they don't give a damn what a bunch of scientists say though. "After the proposal is published in the Federal Register, the E.P.A. will solicit comments from the public for 45 days, Mr. Zeldin said."