Want to exclude a study from a review or meta-analysis because you don't like it but don't have an objective reason for the exclusion? Fear not. Here's the paper you need to cite.

Another wonderful VSS, including the first "Confidence dinner" - nice to see a vibrant community studying visual metacognition. Next up, the CCN Satellite on Metacognitive Science (abstract being accepted until May 27): sites.google.com/view/metacog....

I read the paper. Strong evidence that confidence and affective judgments share common mechanisms. But I didn't understand how you determined that either of them are about probability of being correct. The 4 criteria you set are true for many non-BCH computations: direct.mit.edu/neco/article...

Is this the post that made our paper the most read one at Imagine Neuroscience?!? We should have used that as our title :)