David Monaghan
dmonaghan.bsky.social
David Monaghan
@dmonaghan.bsky.social
79 followers 66 following 81 posts
Sociologist & education researcher @ Shippensburg University. Higher ed, Ed policy, culture, institutionalism, epistemology & methods, social inequality, too many other interests.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
It seems like how we are supposed to find papers for systematic reviews is designed to maximize sensitivity but minimize specificity. I suspect there is a better way. Anyone know of methodological developments in that direction?
Progressives are going to need to rethink their concerns if they care about survival. The 2020 left is massively complicit in the election of Trump.
Opinion | Democrats Are in Crisis. Eat-the-Rich Populism Is the Only Answer.
www.nytimes.com
Does ASHE actually accept papers?
The Bush administration also made its case publicly for an extended period before attacking. Sure, they brazenly lied. But the lack of public deliberation here is striking. Although other US military ops (e.g. Panama 1989) were sprung on everyone with little warning as well.
Contemporary social justice advocates differ from earlier counterparts in making civil society their primary focus, rather than the state or large corporations. Even when focusing on organizations, they sought to change their internal civil societies. Ultimately this meant a focus on individuals.
Or perhaps it is the perennial assaults of Trump 2 that has shut down such debate. But unraveling what “we” did wrong, to contribute to making Trump seem like possibly a better option to many, many people, is at least one-half of the mystery we need to unravel if we are to escape this nightmare.
I think it is entirely evident that the left made catastrophic mistakes over the 2020-2024 period. And yet I see, on this platform, very little seeming awareness of this reality. Perhaps it is the social media effect of only wanting to say popular things.
To be clear, this is mostly a question. I know this sounds paranoid. But part of my brain also thinks it might be true, at least among the tech accelerationists.
Clearly there is also the “war on woke” that is driving this as well, and I think that is forefront for most of the administration. But the tech world clearly has a lot to gain here as well by destroying HE as it exists.
There is a fair amount of animosity against HE in the tech world for this reason. The notion that colleges are illegitimately occupying market space that should be open for digital badging and the like.
Carey’s so-called “university of everywhere” (really a University of Big Tech) hasn’t manifested as quickly as foretold. HE is potentially a big profit source, but you have to get the established institutions out of the way.
I just finished Kevin Carey’s The End of College (always trying to
keep current!), and the juxtaposition with current events is jarring. This is probably paranoid, but do folks think the current assault on HE is partly Silicon Valley trying to strip it for parts?
I would love to watch Trump try to windsurf. I’m not even sure he can swim.
Best way to boost educational attainment and reduce disparities in same: free college, or universal Pre-K?
I think the failing is that is keeps trying to return to the realist model that dominates sociology as a whole. The “hard world” of structure and interest and power and “action”. But the central insights about human intersubjectivity are inconsistent with this model, so they end up being ditched.
My experience reading sociology’s contributions to culture is simply that it is less valuable, nearly uniformly, than these other fields. It makes advances mostly when it imports insights - from anthropology, semiotics, cognitive science. It mulches these for a time and then spins its wheels.
The study of “culture” is, I think, the most difficult area of social research conceptually. It is also the most central. So many fields contribute - linguistics, anthro, biology, psych, philosophy. It is hard to get a handle on all. I have sympathy.
Reading McDonnell’s 2023 ARS article on cultural materiality. The lack of reference to Geertz, and the absence of engagement with anthropology in general, is deafening.
The most serious conceptual failing of cultural sociology is insisting that “action” and “meaning” are distinct.
Is there a good reason not to move to using the 12th grade NAEP as a college entrance exam?
a) because Musk’s target audience won’t see the fact checks, just the lies. We aren’t the target.
This would be funny if it wasn’t true. Or maybe it is still funny?
I swear to God I told my daughter this very week that this was coming: some GOP politician was going to propose that. There’s a race to the bottom in showing fealty — and there is no bottom.
We have reached North Korean levels of sycophantry.

From NY-24’s Claudia Tenney 👇

tenney.house.gov/media/press-...
I am taking a risk by saying this. But this whole thing was foreseeable, and the Left broadly failed to counter it. You can argue about what the mistake was, but it was ours. Not theirs. They don’t care if they are right. We do care if we are dead. And being right don’t matter if you’re dead.