It’s not our job, as educators, to “push people out of their comfort zone”. Because we don’t know where that begins and ends.
Read my article on Medium here (with a link to a longer article): medium.com/@delphiellis...
It’s not our job, as educators, to “push people out of their comfort zone”. Because we don’t know where that begins and ends.
Read my article on Medium here (with a link to a longer article): medium.com/@delphiellis...
These are the way society normalises violence towards women (for example, in media headlines) if she doesn’t meet a man’s “needs”. Eg, “Violence is wrong… unless she doesn’t cook his tea”.
These are the way society normalises violence towards women (for example, in media headlines) if she doesn’t meet a man’s “needs”. Eg, “Violence is wrong… unless she doesn’t cook his tea”.
medium.com/@delphiellis...
medium.com/@delphiellis...
@jamieklingler.bsky.social writes how Madame Pelicot is calling time on that.
@jamieklingler.bsky.social writes how Madame Pelicot is calling time on that.
Example: he should never hurt her … unless she “nags”. We see this in media headlines too often.
Example: he should never hurt her … unless she “nags”. We see this in media headlines too often.
I would add, men’s anger is directed at women because we dare to challenge the status quo and/or reject them. The expectation and sense of entitlement that we accept/be grateful for their attention is a tale as old as time.
I would add, men’s anger is directed at women because we dare to challenge the status quo and/or reject them. The expectation and sense of entitlement that we accept/be grateful for their attention is a tale as old as time.
Where this is the case, it soon becomes clear their intention is to wear you down; no matter what you say, it’s never enough. It’s “sealioning”; avoid, avoid, avoid.
Where this is the case, it soon becomes clear their intention is to wear you down; no matter what you say, it’s never enough. It’s “sealioning”; avoid, avoid, avoid.
It invalidates what we “know” and squashes our spirit.
It invalidates what we “know” and squashes our spirit.
FYI, “I’m sorry you…” is not a proper apology.
medium.com/@delphiellis...
FYI, “I’m sorry you…” is not a proper apology.
medium.com/@delphiellis...
The harm-doer assumes the victim role and implies the actual victim (who may also be the whistle blower) is the offender/attacker, trying to undermine the victim's credibility, often by questioning their “mental capacity".
The harm-doer assumes the victim role and implies the actual victim (who may also be the whistle blower) is the offender/attacker, trying to undermine the victim's credibility, often by questioning their “mental capacity".
The harm-doer assumes the victim role and implies the actual victim (who may also be the whistle blower) is the offender/attacker, trying to undermine the victim's credibility, often by questioning their “mental capacity".
The harm-doer assumes the victim role and implies the actual victim (who may also be the whistle blower) is the offender/attacker, trying to undermine the victim's credibility, often by questioning their “mental capacity".
However where there are behaviours that warrant one, here are the four ‘stages’ of a ‘proper’ apology > medium.com/@delphiellis...
However where there are behaviours that warrant one, here are the four ‘stages’ of a ‘proper’ apology > medium.com/@delphiellis...