Yeah, that’s more than enough. I think a fair share is 3x the amount of your first and student authored papers each year. I bet you’ve exceeded that?
September 9, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Yeah, that’s more than enough. I think a fair share is 3x the amount of your first and student authored papers each year. I bet you’ve exceeded that?
Yeah, that’s mostly my experience.
The tip of the pyramid seems linked to language from empirical-statistical modeling where disciplines can’t draw on ~universally agreed, more general, physical-mathematical theory. But we can as meteorologists. Those are our hard, but most compelling, studies.
The tip of the pyramid seems linked to language from empirical-statistical modeling where disciplines can’t draw on ~universally agreed, more general, physical-mathematical theory. But we can as meteorologists. Those are our hard, but most compelling, studies.
July 9, 2025 at 5:05 PM
Yeah, that’s mostly my experience.
The tip of the pyramid seems linked to language from empirical-statistical modeling where disciplines can’t draw on ~universally agreed, more general, physical-mathematical theory. But we can as meteorologists. Those are our hard, but most compelling, studies.
The tip of the pyramid seems linked to language from empirical-statistical modeling where disciplines can’t draw on ~universally agreed, more general, physical-mathematical theory. But we can as meteorologists. Those are our hard, but most compelling, studies.
Reposted by Eric Bruning
This is @persistent.info’s post with some more technical details – and some further twists like using an LLM to a control an old computer!
blog.persistent.info/2025/07/infi...
blog.persistent.info/2025/07/infi...
Infinite Mac Construction Set
blog.persistent.info
July 9, 2025 at 2:19 AM
This is @persistent.info’s post with some more technical details – and some further twists like using an LLM to a control an old computer!
blog.persistent.info/2025/07/infi...
blog.persistent.info/2025/07/infi...
In one bright spot of normality, what you said sounds exactly like the usual process described by legislative affairs folks at AGU and this does matter more than you (or I) might think. Basic goals like getting them to tally science. Glad they got to hear the fully justified skepticism too!
July 1, 2025 at 5:26 PM
In one bright spot of normality, what you said sounds exactly like the usual process described by legislative affairs folks at AGU and this does matter more than you (or I) might think. Basic goals like getting them to tally science. Glad they got to hear the fully justified skepticism too!
This is a NOAA document, not a congressional one. My understanding based on past learning about the process is that this is the detailed justification that accompanies the top-level budget request from the executive branch. Actual appropriations/bill markup would be in a congressional document.
June 30, 2025 at 5:46 PM
This is a NOAA document, not a congressional one. My understanding based on past learning about the process is that this is the detailed justification that accompanies the top-level budget request from the executive branch. Actual appropriations/bill markup would be in a congressional document.