@davemc5192.bsky.social
He’ll have to press this in the US, (he’s saying in Fl) as the statute has run in UK
He’d also have to prove genuine damage (loss) & that means providing numbers, books, proof, something Trump is always scared of
Last, US has no jurisdiction over a UK Public Co
The BBC should defend itself & see!
He’d also have to prove genuine damage (loss) & that means providing numbers, books, proof, something Trump is always scared of
Last, US has no jurisdiction over a UK Public Co
The BBC should defend itself & see!
November 12, 2025 at 12:55 PM
He’ll have to press this in the US, (he’s saying in Fl) as the statute has run in UK
He’d also have to prove genuine damage (loss) & that means providing numbers, books, proof, something Trump is always scared of
Last, US has no jurisdiction over a UK Public Co
The BBC should defend itself & see!
He’d also have to prove genuine damage (loss) & that means providing numbers, books, proof, something Trump is always scared of
Last, US has no jurisdiction over a UK Public Co
The BBC should defend itself & see!
So! We don’t know the job figures & don’t know when we will know…
How (in)convenient for you!
How (in)convenient for you!
November 11, 2025 at 4:12 PM
So! We don’t know the job figures & don’t know when we will know…
How (in)convenient for you!
How (in)convenient for you!
So! We don’t know the job figures & don’t know when we’ll know…
How (in)convenient for you!
How (in)convenient for you!
November 11, 2025 at 4:10 PM
So! We don’t know the job figures & don’t know when we’ll know…
How (in)convenient for you!
How (in)convenient for you!
Yes! This was the loophole Sauer was promoting at the hearing, but when asked “what’s the emergency?”, he said it was the economy, debt, financial.
That’s not an emergency, that’s a fiscal management issue, (increase taxes, lower spending etc) & he said yes.
So it is a tax then, not an emergency…
That’s not an emergency, that’s a fiscal management issue, (increase taxes, lower spending etc) & he said yes.
So it is a tax then, not an emergency…
November 11, 2025 at 4:03 PM
Yes! This was the loophole Sauer was promoting at the hearing, but when asked “what’s the emergency?”, he said it was the economy, debt, financial.
That’s not an emergency, that’s a fiscal management issue, (increase taxes, lower spending etc) & he said yes.
So it is a tax then, not an emergency…
That’s not an emergency, that’s a fiscal management issue, (increase taxes, lower spending etc) & he said yes.
So it is a tax then, not an emergency…
I would remind Mr Musk that the Irish have survived & thrived from far worse than his racist white SA views of the world…
Ireland is doing quite OK without his opinion thanks very much…
In these ‘small town’ places he refers to he’d be known as a ‘Gobshite!’
Ireland is doing quite OK without his opinion thanks very much…
In these ‘small town’ places he refers to he’d be known as a ‘Gobshite!’
November 11, 2025 at 3:37 PM
I would remind Mr Musk that the Irish have survived & thrived from far worse than his racist white SA views of the world…
Ireland is doing quite OK without his opinion thanks very much…
In these ‘small town’ places he refers to he’d be known as a ‘Gobshite!’
Ireland is doing quite OK without his opinion thanks very much…
In these ‘small town’ places he refers to he’d be known as a ‘Gobshite!’
In fact, Bessent said:-
“The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms... It could simply be the tax decreases that are part of the President’s agenda.”
e.g. he floated:
- No tax on tips
- No tax on overtime
- No tax on Social Security
- Deduction on auto loans
So! There is NO cheque, NO money…
“The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms... It could simply be the tax decreases that are part of the President’s agenda.”
e.g. he floated:
- No tax on tips
- No tax on overtime
- No tax on Social Security
- Deduction on auto loans
So! There is NO cheque, NO money…
November 11, 2025 at 1:21 PM
In fact, Bessent said:-
“The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms... It could simply be the tax decreases that are part of the President’s agenda.”
e.g. he floated:
- No tax on tips
- No tax on overtime
- No tax on Social Security
- Deduction on auto loans
So! There is NO cheque, NO money…
“The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms... It could simply be the tax decreases that are part of the President’s agenda.”
e.g. he floated:
- No tax on tips
- No tax on overtime
- No tax on Social Security
- Deduction on auto loans
So! There is NO cheque, NO money…
I’m no lawyer but I understood SCOTUS gave him immunity so long as he could demonstrate that his act was in pursuance of the powers delegated to him under the Constitution
This is him ‘assuming powers’ that are for Congress & not delegated to him
And that’s what SCOTUS Q’s were getting at
This is him ‘assuming powers’ that are for Congress & not delegated to him
And that’s what SCOTUS Q’s were getting at
November 11, 2025 at 1:04 PM
I’m no lawyer but I understood SCOTUS gave him immunity so long as he could demonstrate that his act was in pursuance of the powers delegated to him under the Constitution
This is him ‘assuming powers’ that are for Congress & not delegated to him
And that’s what SCOTUS Q’s were getting at
This is him ‘assuming powers’ that are for Congress & not delegated to him
And that’s what SCOTUS Q’s were getting at
Immunity? Perhaps, but Power to legislate is a different matter
If SCOTUS were to let this go, then Congress is ‘de facto’ powerless, as its primary Article 1 power is to raise & disperse revenue
He could then make/change ANY Law at will, which is what Sauer was questioned on by several Justices
If SCOTUS were to let this go, then Congress is ‘de facto’ powerless, as its primary Article 1 power is to raise & disperse revenue
He could then make/change ANY Law at will, which is what Sauer was questioned on by several Justices
November 11, 2025 at 11:19 AM
Immunity? Perhaps, but Power to legislate is a different matter
If SCOTUS were to let this go, then Congress is ‘de facto’ powerless, as its primary Article 1 power is to raise & disperse revenue
He could then make/change ANY Law at will, which is what Sauer was questioned on by several Justices
If SCOTUS were to let this go, then Congress is ‘de facto’ powerless, as its primary Article 1 power is to raise & disperse revenue
He could then make/change ANY Law at will, which is what Sauer was questioned on by several Justices
“We’re not in Kansas anymore Toto!”
Where will he bring this lawsuit? In the US, in the UK…
If it’s the US, it’s meaningless, & if it’s the UK it wouldn’t make a courtroom
It’s the same Reality TV Shock Headline stuff we’ve come to know from him. Bully, coerce your way thru life…
It’s bullsh*t!
Where will he bring this lawsuit? In the US, in the UK…
If it’s the US, it’s meaningless, & if it’s the UK it wouldn’t make a courtroom
It’s the same Reality TV Shock Headline stuff we’ve come to know from him. Bully, coerce your way thru life…
It’s bullsh*t!
November 11, 2025 at 10:40 AM
“We’re not in Kansas anymore Toto!”
Where will he bring this lawsuit? In the US, in the UK…
If it’s the US, it’s meaningless, & if it’s the UK it wouldn’t make a courtroom
It’s the same Reality TV Shock Headline stuff we’ve come to know from him. Bully, coerce your way thru life…
It’s bullsh*t!
Where will he bring this lawsuit? In the US, in the UK…
If it’s the US, it’s meaningless, & if it’s the UK it wouldn’t make a courtroom
It’s the same Reality TV Shock Headline stuff we’ve come to know from him. Bully, coerce your way thru life…
It’s bullsh*t!
Maybe, but the point is he’s admitting it’s NOT a ‘Regulatory’ thing, as his Lawyer submitted & advocated at the SCOTUS hearing. His tariffs are for ’collecting revenue’…
& as Roberts pointed out to him “That’s a Tax on Americans”
He has no powers to notionally raise taxes, so that… Is ILLEGAL!
& as Roberts pointed out to him “That’s a Tax on Americans”
He has no powers to notionally raise taxes, so that… Is ILLEGAL!
November 11, 2025 at 9:38 AM
Maybe, but the point is he’s admitting it’s NOT a ‘Regulatory’ thing, as his Lawyer submitted & advocated at the SCOTUS hearing. His tariffs are for ’collecting revenue’…
& as Roberts pointed out to him “That’s a Tax on Americans”
He has no powers to notionally raise taxes, so that… Is ILLEGAL!
& as Roberts pointed out to him “That’s a Tax on Americans”
He has no powers to notionally raise taxes, so that… Is ILLEGAL!
So! You admit its not a ‘Regulatory’ thing then, as your Lawyer submitted & advocated at the SCOTUS hearing
As Roberts pointed out to him “It’s a Tax on Americans”
And that… Is ILLEGAL!
As Roberts pointed out to him “It’s a Tax on Americans”
And that… Is ILLEGAL!
November 11, 2025 at 5:53 AM
So! You admit its not a ‘Regulatory’ thing then, as your Lawyer submitted & advocated at the SCOTUS hearing
As Roberts pointed out to him “It’s a Tax on Americans”
And that… Is ILLEGAL!
As Roberts pointed out to him “It’s a Tax on Americans”
And that… Is ILLEGAL!
“President Trump said…”
That’s all we hear from the MSM every day… it’s exhausting & at this stage, it’s boring!
Where are these so called Trade Deals? With Can, Mex, Jap, S Korea, Ch, Ind, Aus, EU. None of them ACTUALLY exist…
Report that!
That’s all we hear from the MSM every day… it’s exhausting & at this stage, it’s boring!
Where are these so called Trade Deals? With Can, Mex, Jap, S Korea, Ch, Ind, Aus, EU. None of them ACTUALLY exist…
Report that!
November 11, 2025 at 3:44 AM
“President Trump said…”
That’s all we hear from the MSM every day… it’s exhausting & at this stage, it’s boring!
Where are these so called Trade Deals? With Can, Mex, Jap, S Korea, Ch, Ind, Aus, EU. None of them ACTUALLY exist…
Report that!
That’s all we hear from the MSM every day… it’s exhausting & at this stage, it’s boring!
Where are these so called Trade Deals? With Can, Mex, Jap, S Korea, Ch, Ind, Aus, EU. None of them ACTUALLY exist…
Report that!
Seems like he decided that R’s are going to get blamed for healthcare anyway, so why stop them
Particularly when getting you’re Caucus in line is like herding cats
Not much thought for the victim here tho, the Voter!
Particularly when getting you’re Caucus in line is like herding cats
Not much thought for the victim here tho, the Voter!
November 11, 2025 at 1:30 AM
Seems like he decided that R’s are going to get blamed for healthcare anyway, so why stop them
Particularly when getting you’re Caucus in line is like herding cats
Not much thought for the victim here tho, the Voter!
Particularly when getting you’re Caucus in line is like herding cats
Not much thought for the victim here tho, the Voter!
“Negotiate?” How absurd!
What? Like you negotiate with you’re energy supplier or you’re utility provider, or you’re landlord…
Words for the ‘peasants’, that’s all it is… Words!
What? Like you negotiate with you’re energy supplier or you’re utility provider, or you’re landlord…
Words for the ‘peasants’, that’s all it is… Words!
November 11, 2025 at 1:17 AM
“Negotiate?” How absurd!
What? Like you negotiate with you’re energy supplier or you’re utility provider, or you’re landlord…
Words for the ‘peasants’, that’s all it is… Words!
What? Like you negotiate with you’re energy supplier or you’re utility provider, or you’re landlord…
Words for the ‘peasants’, that’s all it is… Words!
Do you guys work for Trump?
“Urged”?? Come on…
It’s easy to see why you don’t print his tweet, it’s sure not your headline…
“Urged”?? Come on…
It’s easy to see why you don’t print his tweet, it’s sure not your headline…
November 10, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Do you guys work for Trump?
“Urged”?? Come on…
It’s easy to see why you don’t print his tweet, it’s sure not your headline…
“Urged”?? Come on…
It’s easy to see why you don’t print his tweet, it’s sure not your headline…
I’m sure critics do!
Sensible consumers (the general public!), call it good consumer legislation…
Sensible consumers (the general public!), call it good consumer legislation…
November 10, 2025 at 3:27 PM
I’m sure critics do!
Sensible consumers (the general public!), call it good consumer legislation…
Sensible consumers (the general public!), call it good consumer legislation…
For many other Western Nations, today is Remembrance Sunday, where we honour those who fought in 2 World Wars to save Western Democracy
It’ll pass unnoticed in Trump’s Season 2 America & that is the difference
Unfortunately the US has lost its way. Lost to Greed, Racism & Misogyny!
It’ll pass unnoticed in Trump’s Season 2 America & that is the difference
Unfortunately the US has lost its way. Lost to Greed, Racism & Misogyny!
November 9, 2025 at 2:09 PM
For many other Western Nations, today is Remembrance Sunday, where we honour those who fought in 2 World Wars to save Western Democracy
It’ll pass unnoticed in Trump’s Season 2 America & that is the difference
Unfortunately the US has lost its way. Lost to Greed, Racism & Misogyny!
It’ll pass unnoticed in Trump’s Season 2 America & that is the difference
Unfortunately the US has lost its way. Lost to Greed, Racism & Misogyny!
Oh! So she’s emailing her friends & family from prison…
That says it all for Trump’s America!
That says it all for Trump’s America!
November 9, 2025 at 1:43 PM
Oh! So she’s emailing her friends & family from prison…
That says it all for Trump’s America!
That says it all for Trump’s America!
Yes! It seems that unsatisfied with the level of personal debt we are all in ($17tn at last count), the elites want more!
They want us in permanent servitude. It’s the 21st century “Grapes of Wrath!”…
They want us in permanent servitude. It’s the 21st century “Grapes of Wrath!”…
November 9, 2025 at 12:11 PM
Yes! It seems that unsatisfied with the level of personal debt we are all in ($17tn at last count), the elites want more!
They want us in permanent servitude. It’s the 21st century “Grapes of Wrath!”…
They want us in permanent servitude. It’s the 21st century “Grapes of Wrath!”…
This is really all about oil isn’t it?
The Saudi’s (thru OPEC) are steadily taking their oil market share back & when they get it, THEY get to control the market & the price
Trump is gonna try & stop them, even if that means changing a regime…
I mean, it’s not as if the US hasn’t done it before!
The Saudi’s (thru OPEC) are steadily taking their oil market share back & when they get it, THEY get to control the market & the price
Trump is gonna try & stop them, even if that means changing a regime…
I mean, it’s not as if the US hasn’t done it before!
November 7, 2025 at 10:39 PM
This is really all about oil isn’t it?
The Saudi’s (thru OPEC) are steadily taking their oil market share back & when they get it, THEY get to control the market & the price
Trump is gonna try & stop them, even if that means changing a regime…
I mean, it’s not as if the US hasn’t done it before!
The Saudi’s (thru OPEC) are steadily taking their oil market share back & when they get it, THEY get to control the market & the price
Trump is gonna try & stop them, even if that means changing a regime…
I mean, it’s not as if the US hasn’t done it before!