I don't know why we need steps when the answers are so obvious.

I have no idea. But even if it took years markets would discount rejoining in advance of the event: so you'd get some benefits early: e.g. lower inflation from £ revaluation, flood of foreign direct investment in advance. Possibly some trade barriers lowered before full rejoin(e.g. customs union, SM

Polanski's policy is to rejoin the EU so +6% GDP is not far fetched or magical.

also if he hasn't sold he is now down about -50% from peak.

Number go Down

but he's so religiously attached I can see him holding MSTR all the way to $0.0001

Saylor's voice is just so nasal and grating. I don't understand why anyone would ever want to listen to a word he says.

lowering trade barriers. E.g. rejoin the EU. And stop with the neoliberalism/asset sales.

"Island of strangers" backfired - lost Labour core support and did not attract reform voters.

By all means scrutinize claims but claims are not invalidated by attacking the source rather than the claim.

Condescension and sarcasm is ad hominem: "try making an argument"

oh my god. 1. it is a fallacy and 2. it absolutely undermines your counter argument. I have provided links for you to understand the fallacy. It is not my fault if you won't read them. Don't be irrational.

also given that you don't even accept you are continually the fallacies as corner stones of your argument - you are in no position to lecture me on whether or not I should point them out. It's not a magic spell to identify them in another's argument: it's basic analysis.

Why are you so aggressive and condescending? Try not resorting to ad hominem. I have made continual arguments.

that was Chan's claim

meow