Noblesse Ob-la-di Ob-la-da
@couldntbeme.bsky.social
Med student in PA
Sickos_haha_yes.jpeg
Sickos_haha_yes.jpeg
I’m not compelled by this source, which is why I asked.
Do you also insist that SARS-1 was from a lab? Very similar virus from similar area.
Wuhan is where they do field work because it’s centrally located in the region of the world where animal reservoirs of coronaviruses are concentrated.
Do you also insist that SARS-1 was from a lab? Very similar virus from similar area.
Wuhan is where they do field work because it’s centrally located in the region of the world where animal reservoirs of coronaviruses are concentrated.
March 30, 2025 at 8:57 PM
I’m not compelled by this source, which is why I asked.
Do you also insist that SARS-1 was from a lab? Very similar virus from similar area.
Wuhan is where they do field work because it’s centrally located in the region of the world where animal reservoirs of coronaviruses are concentrated.
Do you also insist that SARS-1 was from a lab? Very similar virus from similar area.
Wuhan is where they do field work because it’s centrally located in the region of the world where animal reservoirs of coronaviruses are concentrated.
Alphafold2 is worthwhile. I’ve used it myself with good results. Never heard of protein LLMs, not something OpenAI has spoken much about.
But antibiotic development is not a very profitable field, unfortunately. So it’s not a good reason for the valuations.
But antibiotic development is not a very profitable field, unfortunately. So it’s not a good reason for the valuations.
March 29, 2025 at 11:32 PM
Alphafold2 is worthwhile. I’ve used it myself with good results. Never heard of protein LLMs, not something OpenAI has spoken much about.
But antibiotic development is not a very profitable field, unfortunately. So it’s not a good reason for the valuations.
But antibiotic development is not a very profitable field, unfortunately. So it’s not a good reason for the valuations.
It’s not the only focus, but this part of the article is basically what I’m saying.
March 29, 2025 at 10:25 PM
It’s not the only focus, but this part of the article is basically what I’m saying.
December 4, 2024 at 9:43 PM
Number 1 tenet of WSJ Opinion pages: Dems are making a mistake! Even if they took our own advice from 2 weeks ago!
August 9, 2024 at 10:11 AM
Number 1 tenet of WSJ Opinion pages: Dems are making a mistake! Even if they took our own advice from 2 weeks ago!
I do not respect someone who is attempting to accomplish good things in ways that SHE KNOWS will 100% fail. This is her third attempt running for president without a hope of winning. If her true priority were actually environmentalism, this is not how she would behave.
August 9, 2024 at 3:20 AM
I do not respect someone who is attempting to accomplish good things in ways that SHE KNOWS will 100% fail. This is her third attempt running for president without a hope of winning. If her true priority were actually environmentalism, this is not how she would behave.
