They are good decorations tbf, enjoy.

Far too early! Ruins it.

It probably is a waste of breath it was just a statement. I’d say of course all children have/should to be supported by state if in poverty, but ideally they would stop at two. That was it. Naive idealism I agree…

how very patronising

I agree with all that, and of course no I don't. Lots of adding meaning which I didn't state. When did I say kids should starve? Who are you arguing with? Not me! I simply stated you shouldn't keep having children and relying on the state. Anyway #end

They should get support I guess, though there is argument it’s fair you suffer because of your parents idiocy. Neither argument takes away from fact you shouldn’t have more than two of you can’t afford it, but even if poor should be able to have two, with support, imo.

I was referring to people having children purposefully without income to support them. True circumstances change and should then get support. Complex…

Children shouldn’t grow up in poverty but if you haven’t got the money to support them you should stop at two.