Dan Ciuriak
ciuriakd.bsky.social
Dan Ciuriak
@ciuriakd.bsky.social
Usually found behind a computer, on a bike, or on the courts with a tennis racquet. If none of the above, check the local pub and stop by for a beer.
Or, as Yogi Berra reportedly said about a St. Louis restaurant: "No one goes there anymore. It's too crowded".
June 23, 2025 at 2:02 PM
Reposted by Dan Ciuriak
As @ciuriakd.bsky.social says, just set one up across the border in Nova Scotia. Authentic weather, authentic accents.
May 22, 2025 at 8:16 PM
If the retailers do not pass on the tariffs to the consumers, there is no gain for American manufacturing because there will be no substitution away from imported products. Cue Bart Simpson on the chalkboard. "There's no gain without pain, there's no gain without pain, there's no...."
May 20, 2025 at 1:45 AM
Isn't Russia trying to adjust borders themselves?
May 19, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Hi Pasi: Not sure I follow what "a follow" here means! But good to see you on the thread!
April 14, 2025 at 11:27 PM
👍
April 13, 2025 at 10:34 PM
These and other aspects of the Reciprocal Tariff are unpacked in my paper on @ssrn.bsky.social - The Trump Reciprocal Tariff: Design Flaws and Trade Costs - papers.ssrn.com/abstract=521...
The Trump Reciprocal Tariff: Design Flaws and Trade Costs
While trade economists have resoundingly condemned the Trump administration's reciprocal tariff policy, and markets have ratified that judgement by plunging on
papers.ssrn.com
April 12, 2025 at 7:25 PM
So the tariffs calculated by such a model in a partial equilibrium setting with only two countries always comes up with the wrong answer. It turns out very hard to quantify the rip-off in trade - and maybe like we always thought trade is not a rip-off but an exchange.
April 12, 2025 at 7:24 PM
So now the US is ripping off Vietnam! But there are all the other tariffs to factor into the simulation and for that you need a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, not a CPE model, which falsifies the USTR assumption that general equilibrium effects can be ignored.
April 12, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Vietnam still loses big time in exports to the US, but the US picks up less of the action because third parties increase their sales to the US. The US also loses in third country markets because Vietnamese supply is now deflected to serve those markets. Fun fact: the US runs a surplus with VN!
April 12, 2025 at 7:16 PM
But here is the interesting thing, this framing ignores the rest of the world. So, at a minimum, you have to expand the model to a 3-region model, Vietnam, the US, and the rest of the World. That's easily done in GSIM. So lets rerun the model in this format but with the same tariff on VN.
April 12, 2025 at 7:14 PM
The discrepancy between lost sales by Vietnam and captured sales by the US is explained by the increase in US domestic prices, which curtail US domestic demand. US producer revenues and price markups (the producer surplus figure) increase but total economic welfare in the US is a loss of $15.8 bn
April 12, 2025 at 7:09 PM
Vietnam loses $106 billion worth of exports to the US and US producers increase shipments by almost $47 billion. The GSIM framework lets us unpack what just happened.
April 12, 2025 at 7:05 PM