Slaves imported from other continents
December 2, 2025 at 2:15 AM
Slaves imported from other continents
Nancy Mace is highly suspicious
December 1, 2025 at 11:13 PM
Nancy Mace is highly suspicious
If they get home field advantage, the Rams are going to be a very tough out
November 28, 2025 at 9:54 PM
If they get home field advantage, the Rams are going to be a very tough out
Trump would never start a post with a ellipsis - Trump passed out and Stephen Miller grabbed his phone
November 28, 2025 at 4:55 AM
Trump would never start a post with a ellipsis - Trump passed out and Stephen Miller grabbed his phone
Stephen Miller wrote that . . . and then did the villain laugh
November 28, 2025 at 4:31 AM
Stephen Miller wrote that . . . and then did the villain laugh
Remember when we had a new rule that medical debt couldn’t go on your credit report - and then Trump canceled it? Good times
November 28, 2025 at 1:57 AM
Remember when we had a new rule that medical debt couldn’t go on your credit report - and then Trump canceled it? Good times
That’s a reasonable response
November 26, 2025 at 10:36 PM
That’s a reasonable response
The content of the advice is privileged
November 26, 2025 at 3:58 AM
The content of the advice is privileged
My dad tells me he flew on one of those from New York to Germany - they had to stop in Iceland to refuel
November 26, 2025 at 3:05 AM
My dad tells me he flew on one of those from New York to Germany - they had to stop in Iceland to refuel
Did he say why Utah remains ahead of Vandy?
November 26, 2025 at 1:18 AM
Did he say why Utah remains ahead of Vandy?
To bone up on Speech and Debate clause law, I recently read the 11th Cir.'s ruling on Senator Graham's motion that the S&D clause immunized him from prosecution for the calls to GA to 'find votes' - the scope of the immunity isn't that broad outside of Congress.
s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23...
s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23...
s3.documentcloud.org
November 25, 2025 at 3:50 PM
To bone up on Speech and Debate clause law, I recently read the 11th Cir.'s ruling on Senator Graham's motion that the S&D clause immunized him from prosecution for the calls to GA to 'find votes' - the scope of the immunity isn't that broad outside of Congress.
s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23...
s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23...
They lost on the appointment issue, not her mishandling of the indictment - and they were already well on-notice about the appointment issue based on how the courts treated Habba's invalid appointment. As badly as Hallinan performed here, this was a Bondi failure.
November 24, 2025 at 8:20 PM
They lost on the appointment issue, not her mishandling of the indictment - and they were already well on-notice about the appointment issue based on how the courts treated Habba's invalid appointment. As badly as Hallinan performed here, this was a Bondi failure.
Yes, there's apparently some caselaw to that effect. Not sure how strong it is (the statute says "any reason") but I suppose we will find out if Trump/DOJ tries to get another one.
November 24, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Yes, there's apparently some caselaw to that effect. Not sure how strong it is (the statute says "any reason") but I suppose we will find out if Trump/DOJ tries to get another one.
Interesting - thanks. It’s curious that the statute says “for any reason” but caselaw says an invalid indictment isn’t a reason.
November 24, 2025 at 6:49 PM
Interesting - thanks. It’s curious that the statute says “for any reason” but caselaw says an invalid indictment isn’t a reason.
He's hoping for a happy ending to the season
November 24, 2025 at 6:30 PM
He's hoping for a happy ending to the season
The statute appears to allow 6 months (as long as it isn't subject to the last sentence), if it's without prejudice, does the district judge have authority to rule that it's some other timeline?
November 24, 2025 at 5:56 PM
The statute appears to allow 6 months (as long as it isn't subject to the last sentence), if it's without prejudice, does the district judge have authority to rule that it's some other timeline?
Yeah, agree - just because they can legally try to re-file doesn't mean they can get it
November 24, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Yeah, agree - just because they can legally try to re-file doesn't mean they can get it
Sigh - they can probably revive it (see 18 USC 3288)
November 24, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Sigh - they can probably revive it (see 18 USC 3288)
Oh look, the SECDEF ignoring the Constitution again (this time the Speech and Debate clause)
November 24, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Oh look, the SECDEF ignoring the Constitution again (this time the Speech and Debate clause)