Does this make private health insurance corporations domestic terrorists for being anti-whatever that is I just described? It’s a compelling argument.

This is why I occasionally frame statements in my pocket rectangle in such a way as to make my political leanings very clear in the evidentiary record.

I am very much for a single-party autocratic rule over healthcare for everyone, and furthermore I support forcible oppression of any opposition.

We, the people:
1776: We, the people don't need no damn King telling us right from wrong!
Also us...
1920: Maybe democracy should mean people vote!
1964: Maybe stop treating people as subcategories!
1973: Maybe People can make private choices!
2024: Maybe a not King can't technically be wrong?

What I'm trying to say is that George Orwell showed us the theoretical formula for the Double-plus good equation. We understand that equation to be applicable to this circumstance. It's now up to us to derive all the nested coefficients when trying to solve the problem.

Without pregnant persons, fetuses, and biological male or female, reproductive rights themselves are a red herring.

The decision which held that your right to privacy in making choices was protected. The recent decision is that your right to make a private choice is dependent on the State.

This means at a minimum conception, we are all a queer person. Because the diversity of subdivision is not scientifically meaningful. Our conformity in not being like each other is a truth we hold that is self-evident.

Say it with me!
We’re here!
We’re Queer!
That’s redundant!

Kind of punk as fuck if you ask me. Let’s banish LGBT and fetus as subcategories of division excluding the Q, which exists ironically for the category non-conformists.

The CDC has now instructed that biologically male or female and the ability of person or persons to be pregnant detract meaningfully from the hard data amassed in the body of scientific knowledge.

This makes each of us a person overcoming all prior misuse of subcategories to marginalize us.

Once opposition to a political ideology is sufficient to be classified as domestic terrorism, one must be sufficiently neutral and generalized to state in terms as broadly as possible the implication or outcome of political activity so as to avoid the unintended appearance of a position.

I was glad to stumble across potustracker.us today. It seems to be a simple updating summary of White House activity.

Rather than stick my head is in the sand to focus, I can condense and schedule exposure to the shock and awe campaign.

Migrating to Blue Sky has been refreshingly desolate. I had forgotten how simple social media could be.

Everything posted by everyone I follow with some object permanence. All read up. No blindside. No doom scroll.

Back to what I attempt agency over in life.

Cont:

I remember walking down the railroad tracks barefoot to go to the grocery store.