Caroline Williams
banner
cherry-limes.bsky.social
Caroline Williams
@cherry-limes.bsky.social
She/her
Genetic counselor (general adult/cancer), biology nerd, and enthusiastic human
🧬🐝🌈
Opinions are my own
I will never forgive them 😭 please! I just want the himbo!
February 1, 2025 at 2:29 AM
Fiona Sangster has several long form videos dissecting characters from Stardew Valley! They will keep you entertained for a long time, whether you know the game or not!
December 23, 2024 at 11:39 PM
Honestly, seems like a cool horse. I’d curry him for sure
December 18, 2024 at 7:00 PM
Probably not in this specific situation? It would be difficult to include unknown environmental impacts into the model and a lot of these conditions are so rare that we may not have enough genomes to adequately train the AI.
December 15, 2024 at 4:21 PM
That’s a fair point. I think what terms we use should probably be chosen by the groups they refer to, which I know is complicated by differing opinions on preferred terms within groups.
December 15, 2024 at 2:57 PM
Check out their YouTube if you need genetics materials for your Spanish and Marshallese patients! They have versions with English subtitles so you can know what information is being shared. #genechat
December 15, 2024 at 2:51 PM
Biological race is a construct, but the socioeconomic impacts of racial thought is real. It sounds like this project is working to ensure that minority groups have the same access to genetic care as everyone else. It didn’t sound like they were using race to guide diagnoses or treatments?
December 15, 2024 at 2:36 PM
And variable expressivity! We can see huge variations in how even monogenic conditions are expressed in different people. Some of that could be due to allelic heterogeneity, but it’s most likely multifactorial factors influencing how monogenic conditions present!
December 15, 2024 at 2:26 PM
I have patients who have a hard time getting insurance to cover high risk screening based on a high Tyrer-Cuzick, so I have low confidence that patients with a low TC but elevated PRS would be able to get coverage. Then I’ve given them this high risk number with nothing to do about it.
December 10, 2024 at 2:07 PM
I think a new word could be useful for the sake of discussions. If we use “life”, then most discussions will remain centered on whether or not it is life. If there’s a new word then maybe it would allow us to move on to other discussions that need to be had?
December 10, 2024 at 1:57 PM
I can’t get past the paywall for the study, but here is the eligibility requirements
December 6, 2024 at 4:09 PM
That’s a good point. My understanding of the NIH’s program is that they were specifically recruiting patients with non-reportables that were concerning for cancer (ex. Multiple breaks on multiple chromosomes). I think that’s why the sample size is so small (107).
December 6, 2024 at 3:59 PM
This also speaks to the importance of labs reporting the specific kind of no call they receive. Some NIPT testing labs will simply report “no call” for everything from suspected cancer to low ff in order to appeal to OB providers that aren’t comfortable handling more complicated no call results.
December 6, 2024 at 3:35 PM