That's enough. We've had enough people indulging in the "thrill of a little conservatism", as a treat. Of considering reactionary thought to be a salacious and taboo in a world descending into reactionary mania.
Give me your MOST woke opinions. We're bringing it back.
“…our faiths call on us to proclaim that transgender, intersex, and nonbinary people deserve respect, love, and equal rights.… our beloveds are created in the image of God – Holy and whole.”
www.uua.org/pressroom/pr...
“…our faiths call on us to proclaim that transgender, intersex, and nonbinary people deserve respect, love, and equal rights.… our beloveds are created in the image of God – Holy and whole.”
www.uua.org/pressroom/pr...
Republicans are ceding more discretion to two billionaires to decide what does and does not, get funded in their states.
It is a power grab CR. I will vote NO.
Republicans are ceding more discretion to two billionaires to decide what does and does not, get funded in their states.
It is a power grab CR. I will vote NO.
Some modern day equivalents here--small but powerful actions you can absolutely do:
Some modern day equivalents here--small but powerful actions you can absolutely do:
www.openculture.com/2024/11/umbe...
www.openculture.com/2024/11/umbe...
"Raging Bullion"
"Raging Bullion"
“Union president Olga Miranda said the janitors were relieved that someone spoke up for them.”
www.ktvu.com/news/ice-age...
Anyway I would like to shout out @runforsomething.bsky.social
Anyway I would like to shout out @runforsomething.bsky.social
No voting on who gets to be people
No voting on who gets to be people
Note: Quakers were some of the earliest supporters of Sanctuary, even putting out a booklet on the topic in 1984 (it's still available). www.nbcnews.com/politics/nat...
Note: Quakers were some of the earliest supporters of Sanctuary, even putting out a booklet on the topic in 1984 (it's still available). www.nbcnews.com/politics/nat...
The law is not a forcefield that prohibits illegal actions. It's a list of consequences that *may* be imposed if you do the proscribed act.
"You can't do that" is just factually incorrect.
The law is not a forcefield that prohibits illegal actions. It's a list of consequences that *may* be imposed if you do the proscribed act.
"You can't do that" is just factually incorrect.
Sure. Probably! If *you* become a Democratic elected or candidate, or show up at party meetings + push, then Democrats become whatever *you* are. This is a fixable problem.
Sure. Probably! If *you* become a Democratic elected or candidate, or show up at party meetings + push, then Democrats become whatever *you* are. This is a fixable problem.