Yes. Never said there wouldn't be ads.

Not on the searches I did yesterday. The amount of paid listing's on search engines has moved specific searches down the results list. It's enshitification driven by profit. If I put a specific site query into a search engine, is it too much to expect it to be in the top 2 results?

When did I ever claim it was accurate? It contains much that is apocryphal or at least wildly inaccurate...

I think you should always treat Internet based information with a degree of caution regardless of it's source. Any idiot can publish any old rubbish, and they frequently do.

Tbf they all say the results may not be accurate, believing them is our issue.

My point was that it doesn't return pages of paid adverts.

You're implying that a standard search engine returns "true" results. I'm not sure it does.

Not sure what that means.

And wrong, people like AI ...mainly because there are no adverts and you get an answer to your query. I put a search into Yahoo fir a specific website it was on page 2.

We are, de management, right?

"Justice Secretary David Lammy is proposing to massively restrict the ancient right to a jury trial by only guaranteeing it for defendants facing rape, murder, manslaughter or other cases passing a public interest test." It is the proposal I was commenting on.

To quote someone wise, this is weapons grade shithousery.

Ffs. All this government had to do was be better than the last one. It's not difficult, given that one engaged in the wholesale slaughter of elderly people and yet, it seems beyond them. The right to trial by jury is a cornerstone of democratic justice, even I know that and I'm an idiot.

Average, that's a very generous description

A sentiment i can get behind, someone pass the festive Branston.