Second of all, he's now saying he didn't know anything about it and relied on what "people said" (Christ) but just ten days ago he was claiming he'd pored over the records.
Second of all, he's now saying he didn't know anything about it and relied on what "people said" (Christ) but just ten days ago he was claiming he'd pored over the records.
"The former agent, Paul Campo, 61, worked for the D.E.A. for about 25 years, the indictment says, first as a special agent in New York and eventually as a high-level official — the deputy chief of the office of financial operations."
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/05/n...
"The former agent, Paul Campo, 61, worked for the D.E.A. for about 25 years, the indictment says, first as a special agent in New York and eventually as a high-level official — the deputy chief of the office of financial operations."
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/05/n...
Everyone in this country has a First Amendment right to criticize their government.
This should send a chill down your spine.
Everyone in this country has a First Amendment right to criticize their government.
This should send a chill down your spine.
New from @annielowrey.bsky.social: www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2025/1...
New from @annielowrey.bsky.social: www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2025/1...
I want to highlight just some of what was in this critical bill and why this is such a loss for Americans.
I want to highlight just some of what was in this critical bill and why this is such a loss for Americans.
Sure, that's accurate. But it is, specifically, about gutting consumer protection.
Trump's FTC head was among those WAAAAAIIIIILLLLLLLLING that the EU fined Xitter for fraudulent blue checks (of which I have one).
Sure, that's accurate. But it is, specifically, about gutting consumer protection.
Trump's FTC head was among those WAAAAAIIIIILLLLLLLLING that the EU fined Xitter for fraudulent blue checks (of which I have one).
fancy that
“On clear-error review, what basis does the majority have to … substitute its own understanding of the direct evidence for the District Court’s? The short answer is: it has none.”
“On clear-error review, what basis does the majority have to … substitute its own understanding of the direct evidence for the District Court’s? The short answer is: it has none.”
They're right about the last part. But the damage they're doing is longterm.
They're right about the last part. But the damage they're doing is longterm.
www.axios.com/2025/12/08/p...
www.axios.com/2025/12/08/p...
Sauer: MQD not a substitute for the removal power for the president
Ban X in the EU now!
Ban X in the EU now!
Block these clowns on site.
Block these clowns on site.