oh wait you literally wrote the rulebook lmfao why am I not surprised. Thanks for the fun activity ig, nice prank

insisting that OP is baiting u into debating them. and now ur saying I'm doing that. Unless people fully agree with u, you seem to pull out your rule book that you misinterpret to avoiding any meaningful exchange of ideas. If it really is about debating the science the why would ur opinion matter?

can we use a different rule book?

as theoretic example, sure I guess I did..? God forbid anyone ask about your thought process and try to understand.

This is where it WOULD be "but debate me" if I pointed out that u fully deflected proving ur point, & then I demanded an answer.
if u can possibly believe it, I was genuinely interested in listening to ur take, but I'm not gonna act like ur argument "loses" if u don't keep engaging. dispute =/= loss

That's not how it works though, you approached OP with ad hominem and a description of a dynamic you initiated. OP didn't demand anything from you or anyone else, OP only made a claim

But sure, act like I'M stupid. Not like I haven't seen that trick used a million times

not that gendies aren't usually chronically online children... but ig I'll take my bets w/ hoping at least some of the interacts r adults without emotional regulation issues or way too much spite at the wrong targets.

BTW; I'm s/p 5 years HRT btw so please kindly watch your mouth about my identity

if trans women aren't male, insurance doesn't have to cover those, and the Medical Industrial Complex doesn't have to support it.
was it difficult to get medical intervention for your transition? think about how hard it'll be when insurances and the MIC have even more reasons to delay your care.

Isn't it you doing what that website lists? You're resorting to insults of character instead of actually discussing the issue at hand, or explaining why what was linked was a poor study....

thanks for the follow recommendation