@cappyjohn.bsky.social
No Kings requires the implication that someone wants to be king, which is patently false. -Every Judicial Ruling has been followed.
- working to create smaller government.
The implication is that Consevatives want to end our government through revolution. A slander of epic proportions.
- working to create smaller government.
The implication is that Consevatives want to end our government through revolution. A slander of epic proportions.
December 7, 2025 at 5:44 PM
No Kings requires the implication that someone wants to be king, which is patently false. -Every Judicial Ruling has been followed.
- working to create smaller government.
The implication is that Consevatives want to end our government through revolution. A slander of epic proportions.
- working to create smaller government.
The implication is that Consevatives want to end our government through revolution. A slander of epic proportions.
The focus should be on protecting Americans.
Illegal immigrants consume 100s of millions of $ in social services, drive up housing costs, and reduce wages for Americans. That is cruel.
Cleaning the mess of the prior administration, is a sad task that must be done. But it's Biden's fault.
Illegal immigrants consume 100s of millions of $ in social services, drive up housing costs, and reduce wages for Americans. That is cruel.
Cleaning the mess of the prior administration, is a sad task that must be done. But it's Biden's fault.
December 7, 2025 at 5:32 PM
The focus should be on protecting Americans.
Illegal immigrants consume 100s of millions of $ in social services, drive up housing costs, and reduce wages for Americans. That is cruel.
Cleaning the mess of the prior administration, is a sad task that must be done. But it's Biden's fault.
Illegal immigrants consume 100s of millions of $ in social services, drive up housing costs, and reduce wages for Americans. That is cruel.
Cleaning the mess of the prior administration, is a sad task that must be done. But it's Biden's fault.
Google AI: Hillary Clinton's team identified and deleted approximately 30,000 emails THEY deemed to be purely personal before turning over about 30,000 work-related emails to the State Department in December 2014.
Hillary's lawyers then permanently destroyed all 30,000.
Hillary's lawyers then permanently destroyed all 30,000.
December 7, 2025 at 3:57 PM
Google AI: Hillary Clinton's team identified and deleted approximately 30,000 emails THEY deemed to be purely personal before turning over about 30,000 work-related emails to the State Department in December 2014.
Hillary's lawyers then permanently destroyed all 30,000.
Hillary's lawyers then permanently destroyed all 30,000.
2 attempts on Trump's life. Murder of a Christian Conservative. Shooting of Ice Agents. Violent attacks by Antifa thugs.
Protecting Democracy, no kings, Fascists, misogynists, homophobes, racists, cultists; let me count the slurs repeated everywhere against your political opponents. Like me.
Protecting Democracy, no kings, Fascists, misogynists, homophobes, racists, cultists; let me count the slurs repeated everywhere against your political opponents. Like me.
December 7, 2025 at 3:44 PM
2 attempts on Trump's life. Murder of a Christian Conservative. Shooting of Ice Agents. Violent attacks by Antifa thugs.
Protecting Democracy, no kings, Fascists, misogynists, homophobes, racists, cultists; let me count the slurs repeated everywhere against your political opponents. Like me.
Protecting Democracy, no kings, Fascists, misogynists, homophobes, racists, cultists; let me count the slurs repeated everywhere against your political opponents. Like me.
Perhaps you might consider that all of your assumptions about Trump supporters are false.
Perhaps they have rationally reviewed the trends occurring and supported by Progressives, and decided that is not progress, but rather that it leads to the degradation of our Country.
Perhaps they have rationally reviewed the trends occurring and supported by Progressives, and decided that is not progress, but rather that it leads to the degradation of our Country.
December 7, 2025 at 3:34 PM
Perhaps you might consider that all of your assumptions about Trump supporters are false.
Perhaps they have rationally reviewed the trends occurring and supported by Progressives, and decided that is not progress, but rather that it leads to the degradation of our Country.
Perhaps they have rationally reviewed the trends occurring and supported by Progressives, and decided that is not progress, but rather that it leads to the degradation of our Country.
First we're deprived of human qualities by being classified as cultists (unthinking adorationists), then predictably you called us racist misogynists.
Where did these reductionist labels start? Who's hand is directing these group thoughts that are so prevalent in progressive thought?
Where did these reductionist labels start? Who's hand is directing these group thoughts that are so prevalent in progressive thought?
December 6, 2025 at 11:31 PM
First we're deprived of human qualities by being classified as cultists (unthinking adorationists), then predictably you called us racist misogynists.
Where did these reductionist labels start? Who's hand is directing these group thoughts that are so prevalent in progressive thought?
Where did these reductionist labels start? Who's hand is directing these group thoughts that are so prevalent in progressive thought?
We were healthy, and just didn't want to be wiped out of something significant happened.
December 6, 2025 at 11:06 PM
We were healthy, and just didn't want to be wiped out of something significant happened.
I'd prefer Gov't money that we could use to buy insurance from Walmart, target, etc who know how to squeeze cost out of a system, and could have clinics in their stores. I know people don't like RFKJR, but he's shaking up a system that badly needs to be shaken hard.
December 6, 2025 at 11:05 PM
I'd prefer Gov't money that we could use to buy insurance from Walmart, target, etc who know how to squeeze cost out of a system, and could have clinics in their stores. I know people don't like RFKJR, but he's shaking up a system that badly needs to be shaken hard.
Hah. I'm old enough to remember pre-ACA. I was paying $160 for my son and I for a high-deductable plan. ACA eliminated all high-deductable plans, and so put him on a $150 plan at college, and my bronze plan was $600 a month. $7100 a year more. ACA is just NOT a good program.
December 6, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Hah. I'm old enough to remember pre-ACA. I was paying $160 for my son and I for a high-deductable plan. ACA eliminated all high-deductable plans, and so put him on a $150 plan at college, and my bronze plan was $600 a month. $7100 a year more. ACA is just NOT a good program.
I just knew that every 7 years it doubles at 10%. I didn't expect a quiz. Bezos is kicking in 250 vs 200.
Rich won't care, but the less fortunate will.
If parents or family added some, compounding could create first-time wealth for millions of Americans.
Maybe change our culture.
Rich won't care, but the less fortunate will.
If parents or family added some, compounding could create first-time wealth for millions of Americans.
Maybe change our culture.
December 6, 2025 at 2:47 PM
I just knew that every 7 years it doubles at 10%. I didn't expect a quiz. Bezos is kicking in 250 vs 200.
Rich won't care, but the less fortunate will.
If parents or family added some, compounding could create first-time wealth for millions of Americans.
Maybe change our culture.
Rich won't care, but the less fortunate will.
If parents or family added some, compounding could create first-time wealth for millions of Americans.
Maybe change our culture.
Regardless of the $$, it grows & parents can add to it.
It's a test program to help Americans. Perhaps someday replace Social Security. Perhaps encourage people to have kids. Perhaps empower people to save for the future. Perhaps replace 401K's.
It's not a bad or insignificant program.
It's a test program to help Americans. Perhaps someday replace Social Security. Perhaps encourage people to have kids. Perhaps empower people to save for the future. Perhaps replace 401K's.
It's not a bad or insignificant program.
December 6, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Regardless of the $$, it grows & parents can add to it.
It's a test program to help Americans. Perhaps someday replace Social Security. Perhaps encourage people to have kids. Perhaps empower people to save for the future. Perhaps replace 401K's.
It's not a bad or insignificant program.
It's a test program to help Americans. Perhaps someday replace Social Security. Perhaps encourage people to have kids. Perhaps empower people to save for the future. Perhaps replace 401K's.
It's not a bad or insignificant program.
MAGA CULT Is a denigrating and dehumanizing term.
MAGA is merely an America First agenda led by a President that originally vocalized the concept, and has worked to implement it.
Over 77 Million people voted for returning our government's focus to America's needs.
Cult or common sense?
MAGA is merely an America First agenda led by a President that originally vocalized the concept, and has worked to implement it.
Over 77 Million people voted for returning our government's focus to America's needs.
Cult or common sense?
December 6, 2025 at 2:08 PM
MAGA CULT Is a denigrating and dehumanizing term.
MAGA is merely an America First agenda led by a President that originally vocalized the concept, and has worked to implement it.
Over 77 Million people voted for returning our government's focus to America's needs.
Cult or common sense?
MAGA is merely an America First agenda led by a President that originally vocalized the concept, and has worked to implement it.
Over 77 Million people voted for returning our government's focus to America's needs.
Cult or common sense?
How about posting a montage of all the boats in one clip?
December 5, 2025 at 10:59 PM
How about posting a montage of all the boats in one clip?
I knew you would go there eventually.
Dehumanizing people having different opinions is the gateway to oppression, beatings and murder.
You've been programmed like a Manchurian Candidate to despise a major segment of your own countrymen. Psy-Op.
(BTW, I haven't watched Fox in 5 years.)
Dehumanizing people having different opinions is the gateway to oppression, beatings and murder.
You've been programmed like a Manchurian Candidate to despise a major segment of your own countrymen. Psy-Op.
(BTW, I haven't watched Fox in 5 years.)
December 4, 2025 at 9:48 PM
I knew you would go there eventually.
Dehumanizing people having different opinions is the gateway to oppression, beatings and murder.
You've been programmed like a Manchurian Candidate to despise a major segment of your own countrymen. Psy-Op.
(BTW, I haven't watched Fox in 5 years.)
Dehumanizing people having different opinions is the gateway to oppression, beatings and murder.
You've been programmed like a Manchurian Candidate to despise a major segment of your own countrymen. Psy-Op.
(BTW, I haven't watched Fox in 5 years.)
It used since 1950.
December 4, 2025 at 9:39 PM
It used since 1950.
The objective is to sink the boat. Sadly it took a second missile. We gotta use a tad bigger payload.
December 4, 2025 at 1:04 PM
The objective is to sink the boat. Sadly it took a second missile. We gotta use a tad bigger payload.
After including Bezo's ~$200 bump.
GROK:
A one-time investment of $1,200 in the S&P 500 stock market for 65 years (assuming an average annual return of approximately 10.4% with dividends reinvested) would grow to over $1,000,000.
GROK:
A one-time investment of $1,200 in the S&P 500 stock market for 65 years (assuming an average annual return of approximately 10.4% with dividends reinvested) would grow to over $1,000,000.
December 4, 2025 at 12:58 PM
After including Bezo's ~$200 bump.
GROK:
A one-time investment of $1,200 in the S&P 500 stock market for 65 years (assuming an average annual return of approximately 10.4% with dividends reinvested) would grow to over $1,000,000.
GROK:
A one-time investment of $1,200 in the S&P 500 stock market for 65 years (assuming an average annual return of approximately 10.4% with dividends reinvested) would grow to over $1,000,000.
From your article.
Republicans’ approval has fallen seven points to 84%.
Democrats at 3%.
Why the disparity?
Is it merely intelligence?
Republicans’ approval has fallen seven points to 84%.
Democrats at 3%.
Why the disparity?
Is it merely intelligence?
December 4, 2025 at 12:49 PM
From your article.
Republicans’ approval has fallen seven points to 84%.
Democrats at 3%.
Why the disparity?
Is it merely intelligence?
Republicans’ approval has fallen seven points to 84%.
Democrats at 3%.
Why the disparity?
Is it merely intelligence?
And I also do exactly that.
However I've also found that the capture of various institutions by the ideological left have tainted many previously credible sources.
However I've also found that the capture of various institutions by the ideological left have tainted many previously credible sources.
December 4, 2025 at 12:41 PM
And I also do exactly that.
However I've also found that the capture of various institutions by the ideological left have tainted many previously credible sources.
However I've also found that the capture of various institutions by the ideological left have tainted many previously credible sources.
House Committee on Homeland Security.
December 4, 2025 at 12:39 PM
House Committee on Homeland Security.