To summarize:
t = 1hr daily
f = 20Hz
pulse width = 200µs
current I = 1mA below discomfort
Do I understand correctly, they set I not to 1mA but 1mA lower than an I that is uncomfortable? Also they relate I to the average of half the bradycardia threshold. Did you understand that?
To summarize:
t = 1hr daily
f = 20Hz
pulse width = 200µs
current I = 1mA below discomfort
Do I understand correctly, they set I not to 1mA but 1mA lower than an I that is uncomfortable? Also they relate I to the average of half the bradycardia threshold. Did you understand that?
The 3.5k€ one advertises that it can also stimulate the cymba concha (for full vagus stimulation), opposed to usual devices.
Though the study seems to affect Tragus only anyways.
t-vns.com
The 3.5k€ one advertises that it can also stimulate the cymba concha (for full vagus stimulation), opposed to usual devices.
Though the study seems to affect Tragus only anyways.
t-vns.com
Otherwise, if the result is "good" (just not good enough to justify spending ~~50 Mio. $) this would be very significant imo. Fibro definition is v broad and the med only reduces down to ~~20% IgG.
Otherwise, if the result is "good" (just not good enough to justify spending ~~50 Mio. $) this would be very significant imo. Fibro definition is v broad and the med only reduces down to ~~20% IgG.
bsky.app/profile/ca48...
Results are scheduled to be reported on a conference:
efic2025.abstractserver.com/program/#/de...
bsky.app/profile/ca48...