However, in my opinion, at this point it's hardly about how to handle a case like Six/Gem and more just how to conduct and carry yourself as an organization under the name Splat Safety Committee. Inciting further harassment and drama for no tangible gain is not how to prioritize community safety.

Did you make an account today just to defend SSC? Anyway that's a really shitty analogy imo because

1. there were 2 people involved so the perpetrator was obvious, the question was the validity of the claim, which is completely different
2. police and and a restraining order were involved

Whether you agree with the claim or not is kind of irrelevant, which is why I left that out of my reply altogether. If someone feels so unsafe in the community that they get police and a restraining order involved, imo you have an obligation as Splat SAFETY to do something

I understand that, I just think the best course of action for the sake of the community's safety would've been to make your response at a more appropriate time. There's a level of accountability that has to be taken, and today's actions haven't convinced me that SS will keep the community safe.

This will bring more negative attention to the community right before its biggest celebration and event ever.

And, because of that, this will cause myself and many others to not trust Splat Safety, as the reckless release of this doc does nothing to make this community safer. Hope it was worth it.

So, back to my initial question. What does this video/document accomplish?

This will undoubtedly lead to Six and iMad getting harassed even more, even if that wasn't the intent.

This will cause victims to continue to be afraid to come forward with their stories bc of how this case was mishandled.

drama and her harassment. I'm not saying to believe all accusations, that would be absurd, but the precedent that this case is setting should make any victim afraid to come forth to this org that's supposed to keep them safe, lest their case be mishandled and personal information be put on blast.

timing is doing no favors.

However, the biggest issue is that, at the end of the day, the org is called Splat Safety, not Splat Who Was Right and Wrong. A member of the community tried to express that she felt unsafe, and SS not only failed her last year, but failed once again by reigniting the

which already led to loss of trust within the community, and Riptide, an event that SS has essentially guaranteed Six will be harassed and therefore unaafe at because of this should she choose to go is an irresponsible choice. Granted, this was obviously supposed to come out much earlier, but its

from what I've observed, most people that deserve to get banned are either excommunicated before Splat Safety makes a verdict, or don't get banned by Splat Safety at all.

The timing of this coming out is also not helping it. Sandwiching its release between Madness' attempt to re-join the community,

over the last 3 years I've been in the community, I don't recall Splat Safety ever being seen as very legitimate in the first place. I never remember trust in the org being very high, with the Isaac and Heller situations coming to mind, and although the doc states there are new faces and processes,

it was an honor to commentate that set my man, absolute cinema

but my back wants to be in bed :///