Brendan O'Loughlin
banner
brendanoloughlin.bsky.social
Brendan O'Loughlin
@brendanoloughlin.bsky.social
He/him

PhD student in the Carstens Lab at The Ohio State University
If I'm understanding this right, this would imply a lot (most?) of published lineage introgression claims could be false positives?

I'm just getting into this sort of math so forgive me if this is a dumb question
November 1, 2025 at 5:44 PM
I also miss east African tea a lot, its different
November 1, 2025 at 5:25 PM
That allows them to mimic human variability (if i ask you the exact same question twice you will almost certainly word the answer differently each time)

If someone knows better than me please correct me!
October 26, 2025 at 9:00 PM
If i had to hazard a guess, it would be because LLM outputs are based on slight randomness. Unlike a traditional computer program where the same inputs get the same outputs every time, LLMs have a degree of randomness that allows them to give different responses to the same prompt.
October 26, 2025 at 8:58 PM
Ahhh, traditional cheating. Humanity is healing
October 23, 2025 at 10:28 PM
One time as a child was enough haha
October 23, 2025 at 8:48 PM
These are not fun to get in your pants
October 22, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Awesome stuff!
October 21, 2025 at 10:16 PM
Is this a new genus or a revision?
October 20, 2025 at 8:25 PM
True but that would be so much effort 🫠

I talked to someone who knows more than me about computation and they said it might be possible to account for biases using some ML method but that it would be a huge pain no matter what
October 15, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Not really helpful to teaching your students, just what I came up with when I self-reflected on why it's not a problem for me lol
October 15, 2025 at 5:39 PM
I feel like it's easier to understand if you know a bit of calculus. Not really the math, but just the conceptual idea that weird things happen over infinite timescales (e.g. asymptotes approach a number bet never reach it etc.)
October 15, 2025 at 5:38 PM
My life goal before I die is to figure out how to unbias inat data to extract actual trend estimates
October 14, 2025 at 8:02 PM
Or not, looks like i cant
October 10, 2025 at 5:50 PM
It would be very helpful! I'll send you a DM
October 10, 2025 at 5:40 PM
The coloration is essentially identical, but the genitalia and barcodes are very different.
October 10, 2025 at 3:43 PM
I will!
October 8, 2025 at 8:24 PM
I will be! They are not my advisors but I will be working with the evolution wasps and some other small arthropods
October 8, 2025 at 7:36 PM
Thanks I'll remember this!
October 8, 2025 at 7:36 PM
I'm very curious if an accurate 3D model can be made of a ~1 mm wasp
October 8, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Its possible! Speaking of which, I've been looking into using microCT for some of my small wasps. I believe we have a machine at my institution, but would you be willing to answer questions I have when I get around to trying to do it?
October 8, 2025 at 7:29 PM
The "spiral" is a little more scrunched inwards than I would expect. Doesn't change the ID though!
October 8, 2025 at 7:26 PM
This is Agelenopsis pennsylvanica if you want a species ID!

Looks a little weird though, maybe due to drying?
October 8, 2025 at 6:56 PM