Joking aside, this is a cool area of study. I'm a datum in the Canadian Long-Term Study on Aging and the multi-year data collection cycles are fascinating.
Joking aside, this is a cool area of study. I'm a datum in the Canadian Long-Term Study on Aging and the multi-year data collection cycles are fascinating.
1) keep it in the ground
2) stuff it back into the ground somehow
3) add more and more of it to the biosphere
#1 is by far the cheapest. So why do we keep doing #3?
Because the costs of #3 are not borne by the producer or the consumer but by the whole world.
1) keep it in the ground
2) stuff it back into the ground somehow
3) add more and more of it to the biosphere
#1 is by far the cheapest. So why do we keep doing #3?
Because the costs of #3 are not borne by the producer or the consumer but by the whole world.