@bigmanbruh409.bsky.social
"IT'S ONE OF THE FEDS BIGGEST DISASTERS"
random sod
Posts are primarily "psychoposting", which is fiction and "in-character". Posts starting with [NPS-OOC] are actually real posts
replies are contextual, figure them out
random sod
Posts are primarily "psychoposting", which is fiction and "in-character". Posts starting with [NPS-OOC] are actually real posts
replies are contextual, figure them out
(CONT:) Starting TOMORROW and up until Christmas day, I will commence the '2025 Milk-Addict New World Order-Christmas Special', during which there will be one daily post. Some of it will be information about me, others will be my usual updates on fighting the Feds.
After that, I will be off.
After that, I will be off.
November 30, 2025 at 7:13 PM
(CONT:) Starting TOMORROW and up until Christmas day, I will commence the '2025 Milk-Addict New World Order-Christmas Special', during which there will be one daily post. Some of it will be information about me, others will be my usual updates on fighting the Feds.
After that, I will be off.
After that, I will be off.
(CONT:) Therefore, I am announcing that I will be going on an indefinite hiatus from posting, and entrusting the account completely to 409-A. This also makes the communication update, for the time being, void.
However, that is not all. I also have a secondary announcement.
However, that is not all. I also have a secondary announcement.
November 30, 2025 at 7:13 PM
(CONT:) Therefore, I am announcing that I will be going on an indefinite hiatus from posting, and entrusting the account completely to 409-A. This also makes the communication update, for the time being, void.
However, that is not all. I also have a secondary announcement.
However, that is not all. I also have a secondary announcement.
[NPS-OOC]
yes this is the entire update, it should not have taken this long but I couldn't be bothered lol
yes this is the entire update, it should not have taken this long but I couldn't be bothered lol
October 4, 2025 at 4:27 PM
[NPS-OOC]
yes this is the entire update, it should not have taken this long but I couldn't be bothered lol
yes this is the entire update, it should not have taken this long but I couldn't be bothered lol
Is this server ready for the milk-addict new world order?
Wait, never mind, that's not me running.
Wait, never mind, that's not me running.
September 4, 2025 at 8:43 PM
Is this server ready for the milk-addict new world order?
Wait, never mind, that's not me running.
Wait, never mind, that's not me running.
oh and the cherry on top, the group that determined this ruling comprised solely of old dudes so yeah
April 17, 2025 at 10:04 AM
oh and the cherry on top, the group that determined this ruling comprised solely of old dudes so yeah
(CONT:) can be barred from womens, and supposedly mens, spaces too. This of course makes it much harder to go into literally any gendered spaces if you are trans, and may require workplaces to outright provide separate spaces for people on this definition of "sex".
April 17, 2025 at 10:04 AM
(CONT:) can be barred from womens, and supposedly mens, spaces too. This of course makes it much harder to go into literally any gendered spaces if you are trans, and may require workplaces to outright provide separate spaces for people on this definition of "sex".
(CONT:) It should be noted that gender identity is a separate characteristic of the Act, and to my knowledge has not been budged in the ruling.
However, the fact of the matter is that inherently ruling that trans women are, in equality cases, men, denies them many protections, and means they
However, the fact of the matter is that inherently ruling that trans women are, in equality cases, men, denies them many protections, and means they
April 17, 2025 at 10:04 AM
(CONT:) It should be noted that gender identity is a separate characteristic of the Act, and to my knowledge has not been budged in the ruling.
However, the fact of the matter is that inherently ruling that trans women are, in equality cases, men, denies them many protections, and means they
However, the fact of the matter is that inherently ruling that trans women are, in equality cases, men, denies them many protections, and means they
(CONT:) 1. Trans women can no longer argue they are being discriminated against for being women and 2. Businesses and whatnot are no longer required to recognise trans women as female. Logic stands that similar stuff applies to trans men. While not stated, the implications for that are there.
April 17, 2025 at 10:04 AM
(CONT:) 1. Trans women can no longer argue they are being discriminated against for being women and 2. Businesses and whatnot are no longer required to recognise trans women as female. Logic stands that similar stuff applies to trans men. While not stated, the implications for that are there.
You already got a very basic summary but I'd like to clarify more on the specifics.
The UK Supreme Court has ruled, for the purposes of the 2010 Equality Act, that the "sex" characteristic does not apply to trans women. While there's nothing immediate, in the future it'll mean two things.
The UK Supreme Court has ruled, for the purposes of the 2010 Equality Act, that the "sex" characteristic does not apply to trans women. While there's nothing immediate, in the future it'll mean two things.
April 17, 2025 at 10:04 AM
You already got a very basic summary but I'd like to clarify more on the specifics.
The UK Supreme Court has ruled, for the purposes of the 2010 Equality Act, that the "sex" characteristic does not apply to trans women. While there's nothing immediate, in the future it'll mean two things.
The UK Supreme Court has ruled, for the purposes of the 2010 Equality Act, that the "sex" characteristic does not apply to trans women. While there's nothing immediate, in the future it'll mean two things.